RYLD vs. MRGR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) and MRGR (Proshares Merger ETF) are both Hedge Fund funds - RYLD tracks the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index while MRGR tracks the S&P Merger Arbitrage Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RYLD returned 2.69%/yr vs 3.99%/yr for MRGR. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for MRGR.

Performance

RYLD vs. MRGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than MRGR's 1.83% return.

RYLD

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.78%
• YTD: 8.33%
• 6M: 9.14%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 7.45%
• 5Y*: 2.69%
• 10Y*: —

MRGR

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 11.14%
• 3Y*: 8.65%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: 3.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYLD vs. MRGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	8.33%	5.65%	10.13%	0.27%	-13.03%	22.13%	-0.44%	8.92%
MRGR Proshares Merger ETF	1.83%	11.99%	5.32%	4.94%	-4.81%	6.58%	1.99%	3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RYLD and MRGR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019	0.29

RYLD vs. MRGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RYLD	MRGR
Financial Services	104.9%	12.7%
Industrials	17.5%	17.6%
Technology	16.8%	5.1%
Healthcare	16.5%	22.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	4.9%
Real Estate	6.2%	12.6%
Energy	6.2%	5.6%
Basic Materials	4.8%	5.8%
Utilities	2.9%	5.4%
Communication Services	2.5%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	2.7%

Return for Risk

RYLD vs. MRGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 66
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 73

MRGR

MRGR Risk / Return Rank: 90
MRGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
MRGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MRGR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MRGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
MRGR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYLD vs. MRGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RYLD	MRGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.72	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	4.63	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.56	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	8.65	-5.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.86	23.71	-9.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RYLD vs. MRGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the MRGR Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLD and MRGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RYLD	MRGR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	2.72	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	1.05	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.36	-0.04

Drawdowns

RYLD vs. MRGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, which is greater than MRGR's maximum drawdown of -13.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and MRGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYLD	MRGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.53%	-13.23%	-28.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.29%	-1.29%	-5.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.05%	-2.10%	-16.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.33%	-8.40%	-12.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-13.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.33%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-3.86%	-4.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	0.47%	+1.08%

Volatility

RYLD vs. MRGR - Volatility Comparison

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR) at 1.08%. This indicates that RYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYLD	MRGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.02%	1.08%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.60%	2.95%	+4.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.67%	4.11%	+6.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.03%	3.82%	+10.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	5.15%	+12.05%

RYLD vs. MRGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MRGR's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYLD vs. MRGR - Dividend Comparison

RYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.65%, more than MRGR's 2.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MRGR Proshares Merger ETF	2.97%	3.12%	3.21%	2.11%	0.61%	0.59%	0.00%	0.78%	1.39%	0.36%	0.74%	0.34%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.65%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYLD and MRGR in my portfolio?

RYLD and MRGR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYLD or MRGR?

RYLD has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to MRGR (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYLD dropped -41.53% vs MRGR's -13.23%.

Which ETF is better, RYLD or MRGR?

On 5-year performance, MRGR leads with 3.99% vs 2.69% for RYLD. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, MRGR has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RYLD or MRGR?

Over the 5-year period, MRGR has performed better with a 3.99% return vs 2.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RYLD or MRGR?

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MRGR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RYLD or MRGR?

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.65%, compared with 2.97% for MRGR.

What is the main difference between RYLD and MRGR?

RYLD tracks CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index, while MRGR tracks S&P Merger Arbitrage Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RYLD and 0.75% for MRGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MRGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.