MRGR vs. VOO
MRGR (Proshares Merger ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MRGR is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the S&P Merger Arbitrage Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MRGR returned 3.47%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MRGR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
MRGR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRGR achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MRGR has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 3.47%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
MRGR
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 11.14%
- 3Y*
- 8.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 3.47%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
MRGR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRGR Proshares Merger ETF | 1.83% | 11.99% | 5.32% | 4.94% | -4.81% | 6.58% | 1.99% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 2.08% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRGR and VOO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2012 | 0.21 |
The correlation between MRGR and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MRGR vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MRGR
VOO
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
MRGR
VOO
Industrials
MRGR
VOO
Financial Services
MRGR
VOO
Real Estate
MRGR
VOO
Basic Materials
MRGR
VOO
Energy
MRGR
VOO
Utilities
MRGR
VOO
Technology
MRGR
VOO
Communication Services
MRGR
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
MRGR
VOO
Consumer Defensive
MRGR
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRGR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
MRGR
VOO
MRGR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRGR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.72 | 2.39 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.63 | 3.25 | +1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.43 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 3.16 | +5.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.71 | 14.73 | +8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRGR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 2.39 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.83 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.87 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.89 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
MRGR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRGR drawdown since its inception was -13.23%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRGR and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRGR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.23% | -33.99% | +20.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | -8.90% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.10% | -18.69% | +16.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.40% | -24.52% | +16.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.23% | -33.99% | +20.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.70% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -3.69% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 1.91% | -1.44% |
Volatility
MRGR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR) is 1.08%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that MRGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRGR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 2.84% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.95% | 8.90% | -5.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 11.80% | -7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.82% | 16.81% | -12.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 18.01% | -12.86% |
MRGR vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRGR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRGR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
MRGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRGR Proshares Merger ETF | 2.97% | 3.12% | 3.21% | 2.11% | 0.61% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 1.39% | 0.36% | 0.74% | 0.34% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRGR and VOO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to MRGR (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRGR dropped -13.23% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 3.47% for MRGR. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MRGR has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 3.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MRGR.
MRGR has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
MRGR is categorized as Hedge Fund, while VOO is S&P 500. MRGR tracks S&P Merger Arbitrage Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MRGR and 0.03% for VOO.
MRGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRGR and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer