RYCEY vs. UHS
RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) and UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) are both stocks. RYCEY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while UHS operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, RYCEY returned 7.64%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for UHS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RYCEY vs. UHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 15.83% return, which is significantly higher than UHS's -30.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has outperformed UHS with an annualized return of 7.64%, while UHS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.30% annualized return.
RYCEY
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 111.25%
- 5Y*
- 68.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.47%
UHS
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- 6M
- -24.46%
- YTD
- -30.74%
- 1Y
- -10.45%
- 3Y*
- 0.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.89%
RYCEY vs. UHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 15.83% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -82.05% | -12.69% | -7.35% | 40.70% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -30.74% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYCEY and UHS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014 | 0.25 |
The correlation between RYCEY and UHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RYCEY:
$150.95B
UHS:
$9.43B
RYCEY:
£0.99
UHS:
$35.24
RYCEY:
13.56
UHS:
4.27
RYCEY:
0.03
UHS:
0.19
RYCEY:
2.83
UHS:
0.37
RYCEY:
£40.04B
UHS:
$17.76B
RYCEY:
£10.10B
UHS:
$12.01B
RYCEY:
£8.04B
UHS:
$2.79B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYCEY vs. UHS — Risk / Return Rank
RYCEY
UHS
RYCEY vs. UHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYCEY | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.97 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | -0.25 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | -0.51 | +4.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYCEY vs. UHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than UHS's maximum drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and UHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYCEY | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.07% | -60.27% | -38.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.75% | -42.00% | +20.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.37% | -42.00% | +18.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.01% | -44.90% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.64% | -56.30% | -38.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.01% | -38.11% | -38.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.09% | -14.88% | -69.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 20.71% | -12.88% |
Volatility
RYCEY vs. UHS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) is 8.23%, while Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that RYCEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYCEY | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.23% | 10.61% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.05% | 26.29% | +6.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.40% | 32.44% | +5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.23% | 31.94% | +11.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.27% | 34.49% | +14.78% |
Dividends
RYCEY vs. UHS - Dividend Comparison
RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than UHS's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.53% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Financials
RYCEY vs. UHS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Universal Health Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RYCEY vs. UHS - Profitability Comparison
RYCEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
UHS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RYCEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
UHS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 502.86M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
RYCEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
UHS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 348.68M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RYCEY and UHS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UHS has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to RYCEY (8.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs UHS's -60.27%.
RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYCEY and UHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer