RXL vs. SQQQ
RXL (ProShares Ultra Health Care) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - RXL tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%) while SQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RXL returned 13.05%/yr vs -56.24%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.62, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
RXL vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXL achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -40.31% return. Over the past 10 years, RXL has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 13.05%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.24% annualized return.
RXL
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -5.67%
- 1Y
- 26.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.95%
- 10Y*
- 13.05%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 9.83%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -40.31%
- 6M
- -37.80%
- 1Y
- -61.11%
- 3Y*
- -53.86%
- 5Y*
- -46.89%
- 10Y*
- -56.24%
RXL vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care | -5.37% | 19.76% | -2.72% | -3.15% | -15.26% | 48.06% | 19.24% | 40.40% | 3.38% | 46.92% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -40.31% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXL and SQQQ is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.62 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between RXL and SQQQ has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.62 to -0.12, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
RXL vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RXL
SQQQ
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
RXL
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
RXL
SQQQ
Basic Materials
RXL
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
RXL
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
RXL
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
RXL
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
RXL
-
SQQQ
-
Industrials
RXL
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
RXL
-
SQQQ
-
Technology
RXL
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
RXL
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXL vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
RXL
SQQQ
RXL vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RXL | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.78 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | -0.96 | +2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.85 | -1.81 | +4.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RXL vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXL drawdown since its inception was -67.70%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXL and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXL | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.70% | -100.00% | +32.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.33% | -63.52% | +42.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.08% | -92.51% | +56.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.08% | -97.27% | +61.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.00% | -99.98% | +48.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.00% | -100.00% | +86.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -92.73% | +76.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.33% | 36.37% | -27.04% |
Volatility
RXL vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) is 10.70%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.69%. This indicates that RXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXL | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.70% | 26.69% | -15.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.46% | 43.33% | -21.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.42% | 53.65% | -23.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.76% | 67.53% | -37.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.28% | 66.47% | -33.19% |
RXL vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RXL and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
RXL vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
RXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than SQQQ's 11.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care | 1.54% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 0.18% | 0.32% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.93% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 11.44% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXL and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.69%) compared to RXL (10.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXL dropped -67.70% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, RXL leads with 13.05% vs -56.24% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, RXL has been the lower-risk option at 10.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RXL has performed better with a 13.05% return vs -56.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RXL and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.44%, compared with 1.54% for RXL.
RXL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
RXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RXL and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer