RXI vs. TMH
RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - RXI tracks the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
RXI vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RXI
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 9.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.65%
TMH
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.84M | $2.90M | $2.10M | |
| $22.41K | $27.94K | $21.44K |
RXI vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.25% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXI and TMH is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXI vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
RXI
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RXI vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RXI | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RXI vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -10.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXI | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.36% | -10.32% | -50.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -5.18% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.52% | -5.09% | -5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | — | — |
Volatility
RXI vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXI | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 27.53% | -10.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 27.53% | -6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.11% | 27.53% | -7.42% |
RXI vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RXI vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than TMH's 4.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.40% | 1.55% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.89% | 0.65% | 1.48% | 1.73% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 4.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXI and TMH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for RXI.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 1.40% for RXI.
RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for RXI and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for RXI and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer