RXI vs. TMH
RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - RXI tracks the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
RXI vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RXI
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- -3.90%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 5.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
TMH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RXI vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | -2.73% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXI and TMH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXI vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
RXI
TMH
RXI vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RXI | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RXI | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | -5.39 | +5.79 |
Drawdowns
RXI vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXI | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.36% | -5.59% | -54.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -5.59% | -2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.54% | -4.22% | -6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | — | — |
Volatility
RXI vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXI | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 20.85% | -4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 20.85% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 20.85% | -0.72% |
RXI vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RXI vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, while TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.62% | 1.55% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.89% | 0.65% | 1.48% | 1.73% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXI and TMH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for RXI.
RXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.
RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for RXI and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for RXI and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer