PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWJ vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWJ vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RWJ having a 15.88% return and USVM slightly lower at 15.26%.


RWJ

1D
-1.07%
1M
1.90%
YTD
15.88%
6M
14.97%
1Y
36.55%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
13.02%

USVM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.60%
YTD
15.26%
6M
15.00%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWJ vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
15.88%7.75%11.81%16.21%-10.97%52.82%20.83%20.29%-16.95%3.29%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
15.26%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between RWJ and USVM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.90

The correlation between RWJ and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWJ vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWJ
USVM

Consumer Cyclical

23.9%
11.1%

Industrials

16.2%
12.1%

Healthcare

11.2%
11.0%

Financial Services

11.0%
22.0%

Technology

9.9%
11.6%

Energy

7.4%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
5.0%

Basic Materials

5.2%
1.8%

Real Estate

4.0%
11.9%

Communication Services

3.3%
2.8%

Utilities

0.9%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

RWJ
23.9%
USVM
11.1%

Industrials

RWJ
16.2%
USVM
12.1%

Healthcare

RWJ
11.2%
USVM
11.0%

Financial Services

RWJ
11.0%
USVM
22.0%

Technology

RWJ
9.9%
USVM
11.6%

Energy

RWJ
7.4%
USVM
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

RWJ
6.9%
USVM
5.0%

Basic Materials

RWJ
5.2%
USVM
1.8%

Real Estate

RWJ
4.0%
USVM
11.9%

Communication Services

RWJ
3.3%
USVM
2.8%

Utilities

RWJ
0.9%
USVM
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWJ vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWJ
RWJ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
RWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWJ vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWJUSVMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

2.05

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

2.98

-0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.66

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.39

13.76

-3.37

RWJ vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWJ and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWJUSVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.05

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.50

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.49

-0.03

Drawdowns

RWJ vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWJUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.97%

-42.38%

-13.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-8.36%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.29%

-24.34%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.29%

-25.27%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-0.57%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-7.90%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

2.22%

+1.31%

Volatility

RWJ vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWJUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.50%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

10.73%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.40%

14.93%

+4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.71%

19.65%

+4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.14%

22.01%

+4.13%

RWJ vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWJ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWJ vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than USVM's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
1.01%1.11%1.15%1.34%1.02%0.61%0.89%1.22%1.44%1.11%0.60%0.74%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.76%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, RWJ and USVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RWJ has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to USVM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWJ dropped -55.97% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 7.73% for RWJ. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWJ.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.01% for RWJ.

RWJ is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. RWJ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWJ and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWJ and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer