RWJ vs. USVM
RWJ (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWJ is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index, while USVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RWJ returned 7.73%/yr vs 9.74%/yr for USVM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RWJ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
RWJ vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RWJ having a 15.88% return and USVM slightly lower at 15.26%.
RWJ
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 15.88%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 36.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.02%
USVM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- —
RWJ vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 15.88% | 7.75% | 11.81% | 16.21% | -10.97% | 52.82% | 20.83% | 20.29% | -16.95% | 3.29% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 15.26% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWJ and USVM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between RWJ and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
RWJ vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RWJ
USVM
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
RWJ
USVM
Industrials
RWJ
USVM
Healthcare
RWJ
USVM
Financial Services
RWJ
USVM
Technology
RWJ
USVM
Energy
RWJ
USVM
Consumer Defensive
RWJ
USVM
Basic Materials
RWJ
USVM
Real Estate
RWJ
USVM
Communication Services
RWJ
USVM
Utilities
RWJ
USVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWJ vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
RWJ
USVM
RWJ vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWJ | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 2.05 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 2.98 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.66 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.39 | 13.76 | -3.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWJ | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.05 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.50 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.49 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
RWJ vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWJ | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.97% | -42.38% | -13.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -8.36% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.29% | -24.34% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.29% | -25.27% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -0.57% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -7.90% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 2.22% | +1.31% |
Volatility
RWJ vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWJ | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 4.50% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 10.73% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.40% | 14.93% | +4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 19.65% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.14% | 22.01% | +4.13% |
RWJ vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWJ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWJ vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than USVM's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 1.01% | 1.11% | 1.15% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 0.61% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.11% | 0.60% | 0.74% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.76% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, RWJ and USVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RWJ has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to USVM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWJ dropped -55.97% vs USVM's -42.38%.
On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 7.73% for RWJ. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWJ.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.01% for RWJ.
RWJ is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. RWJ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWJ and 0.29% for USVM.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWJ and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer