RWIGX vs. RLBGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RWIGX (Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6) and RLBGX (American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6) are both mutual funds - RWIGX is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI), while RLBGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 10 years, RWIGX returned 12.48%/yr vs 10.43%/yr for RLBGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RWIGX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for RLBGX.

Performance

RWIGX vs. RLBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWIGX achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly higher than RLBGX's 9.60% return. Over the past 10 years, RWIGX has outperformed RLBGX with an annualized return of 12.48%, while RLBGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.43% annualized return.

RWIGX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 5.02%
• YTD: 15.78%
• 6M: 17.12%
• 1Y: 33.10%
• 3Y*: 22.30%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

RLBGX

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: 9.60%
• 6M: 10.45%
• 1Y: 24.34%
• 3Y*: 17.71%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: 10.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWIGX vs. RLBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RWIGX Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6	15.78%	25.09%	14.21%	20.87%	-17.02%	15.11%	15.71%	25.94%	-10.32%	24.95%
RLBGX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6	9.60%	18.83%	15.35%	13.92%	-11.85%	16.10%	11.20%	18.95%	-3.07%	14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between RWIGX and RLBGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010	0.92

The correlation between RWIGX and RLBGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RWIGX vs. RLBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWIGX

RWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 72
RWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
RWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
RWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
RWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

RLBGX

RLBGX Risk / Return Rank: 83
RLBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
RLBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
RLBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
RLBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
RLBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWIGX vs. RLBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RWIGX	RLBGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.86	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	4.01	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.54	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	3.57	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.17	16.12	-1.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RWIGX vs. RLBGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the RLBGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWIGX and RLBGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RWIGX	RLBGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	2.86	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.94	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.98	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.98	-0.34

Drawdowns

RWIGX vs. RLBGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWIGX drawdown since its inception was -31.98%, which is greater than RLBGX's maximum drawdown of -22.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIGX and RLBGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWIGX	RLBGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.98%	-22.33%	-9.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.50%	-6.98%	-3.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.54%	-10.65%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.03%	-18.59%	-8.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.98%	-22.33%	-9.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.46%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.14%	-2.46%	-2.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	1.54%	+0.84%

Volatility

RWIGX vs. RLBGX - Volatility Comparison

Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) at 2.70%. This indicates that RWIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWIGX	RLBGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	2.70%	+1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.07%	6.80%	+4.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.52%	8.71%	+4.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.20%	10.49%	+4.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.05%	10.67%	+5.38%

RWIGX vs. RLBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWIGX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than RLBGX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWIGX vs. RLBGX - Dividend Comparison

RWIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.42%, more than RLBGX's 7.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RLBGX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6	7.85%	8.56%	7.50%	2.27%	2.63%	4.59%	4.65%	3.78%	5.81%	4.92%	4.54%	5.91%
RWIGX Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6	9.42%	10.86%	8.23%	3.44%	2.45%	7.16%	1.53%	2.90%	7.37%	6.94%	5.60%	4.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWIGX and RLBGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, RWIGX and RLBGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RWIGX or RLBGX?

RWIGX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to RLBGX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWIGX dropped -31.98% vs RLBGX's -22.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.