PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWIGX vs. TCIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWIGX vs. TCIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWIGX achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly higher than TCIEX's 11.81% return. Over the past 10 years, RWIGX has outperformed TCIEX with an annualized return of 12.08%, while TCIEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.61% annualized return.


RWIGX

1D
0.90%
1M
-0.15%
6M
8.19%
YTD
14.23%
1Y
28.10%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
12.08%
ALL TIME*
10.08%

TCIEX

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.27%
6M
5.70%
YTD
11.81%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
9.61%
ALL TIME*
7.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RWIGX vs. TCIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWIGX
Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6
14.23%25.09%14.21%20.87%-17.02%15.11%15.71%25.94%-10.32%24.95%
TCIEX
TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class
11.81%31.55%3.69%18.21%-14.19%11.30%8.13%21.82%-13.27%25.34%

Correlation

The correlation between RWIGX and TCIEX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.92

The correlation between RWIGX and TCIEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWIGX vs. TCIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RWIGX
RWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TCIEX
TCIEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TCIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TCIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RWIGX vs. TCIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWIGXTCIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.24

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.31

8.45

+1.86

RWIGX vs. TCIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the TCIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWIGX and TCIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWIGX vs. TCIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWIGX drawdown since its inception was -31.98%, smaller than the maximum TCIEX drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIGX and TCIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWIGXTCIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.98%

-59.27%

+27.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-11.35%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-13.58%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.03%

-29.25%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.98%

-33.58%

+1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-0.76%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-10.52%

+5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

3.00%

-0.43%

Volatility

RWIGX vs. TCIEX - Volatility Comparison

Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX) have volatilities of 4.42% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWIGXTCIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

4.62%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

13.45%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.12%

15.80%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.46%

16.24%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

16.40%

-0.38%

RWIGX vs. TCIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWIGX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than TCIEX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWIGX vs. TCIEX - Dividend Comparison

RWIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, more than TCIEX's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWIGX
Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6
9.60%10.86%8.23%3.44%2.45%7.16%1.53%2.90%7.37%6.94%5.60%4.04%
TCIEX
TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class
3.48%3.89%3.17%3.14%2.82%3.02%1.96%3.08%3.42%2.78%2.95%3.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWIGX and TCIEX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCIEX has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to RWIGX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWIGX dropped -31.98% vs TCIEX's -59.27%.

RWIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWIGX and TCIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer