RLBGX vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

RLBGX (American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - RLBGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, RLBGX returned 10.46%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for VOO. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RLBGX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

RLBGX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RLBGX having a 9.90% return and VOO slightly higher at 10.07%. Over the past 10 years, RLBGX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.46%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.

RLBGX

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 6M: 10.84%
• 1Y: 24.21%
• 3Y*: 17.21%
• 5Y*: 10.26%
• 10Y*: 10.46%

VOO

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 10.07%
• 6M: 10.31%
• 1Y: 27.14%
• 3Y*: 20.91%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: 15.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLBGX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RLBGX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6	9.90%	18.83%	15.35%	13.92%	-11.85%	16.10%	11.20%	18.95%	-3.07%	14.97%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	10.07%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RLBGX and VOO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010	0.95

The correlation between RLBGX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RLBGX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLBGX

RLBGX Risk / Return Rank: 85
RLBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
RLBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
RLBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
RLBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
RLBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 70
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLBGX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RLBGX	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.18	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	2.93	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.39	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	3.02	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.32	13.61	+1.71

RLBGX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLBGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLBGX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RLBGX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLBGX drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLBGX and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLBGX	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.33%	-33.99%	+11.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.98%	-8.90%	+1.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.65%	-18.69%	+8.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.59%	-24.52%	+5.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.33%	-33.99%	+11.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-1.45%	+1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-3.68%	+1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.97%	-0.40%

Volatility

RLBGX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) is 3.44%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that RLBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLBGX	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	4.69%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.33%	9.79%	-2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.17%	12.37%	-3.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.57%	16.90%	-6.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.71%	18.05%	-7.34%

RLBGX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLBGX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

RLBGX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

RLBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RLBGX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6	7.38%	8.56%	7.50%	2.27%	2.63%	4.59%	4.65%	3.78%	5.81%	4.92%	4.54%	5.91%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RLBGX and VOO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, RLBGX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RLBGX or VOO?

VOO has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to RLBGX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLBGX dropped -22.33% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.