RVNL vs. FBL

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

RVNL (GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF) and FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RVNL returned -16.81% vs -39.76% for FBL. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.

Performance

RVNL vs. FBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVNL achieves a -45.20% return, which is significantly lower than FBL's -27.71% return.

RVNL

• 1D: -19.35%
• 1M: 21.38%
• YTD: -45.20%
• 6M: -37.35%
• 1Y: -16.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBL

• 1D: -11.22%
• 1M: -8.20%
• YTD: -27.71%
• 6M: -31.07%
• 1Y: -39.76%
• 3Y*: 29.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVNL vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RVNL GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF	-45.20%	117.81%
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	-27.71%	51.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RVNL and FBL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.22

RVNL vs. FBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RVNL	FBL
Consumer Cyclical	66.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	66.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RVNL vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVNL

RVNL Risk / Return Rank: 11
RVNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RVNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
RVNL Omega Ratio Rank: 16
RVNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RVNL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FBL

FBL Risk / Return Rank: 4
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVNL vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RVNL	FBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	-0.56	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	-0.51	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.93	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	-0.65	+0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	-1.20	+0.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RVNL vs. FBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVNL Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is higher than the FBL Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVNL and FBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RVNL	FBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13	-0.56	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	1.03	-0.90

Drawdowns

RVNL vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVNL drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than FBL's maximum drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNL and FBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVNL	FBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.92%	-61.15%	-11.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.92%	-61.03%	-11.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-61.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.98%	-53.15%	-4.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.22%	-16.49%	-23.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.30%	33.06%	+7.24%

Volatility

RVNL vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) has a higher volatility of 37.10% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) at 21.18%. This indicates that RVNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RVNL	FBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.10%	21.18%	+15.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	93.68%	54.38%	+39.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	127.61%	71.03%	+56.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	125.00%	71.25%	+53.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	125.00%	71.25%	+53.75%

RVNL vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RVNL and FBL have an expense ratio of 1.15%.

Dividends

RVNL vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison

RVNL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	2.87%	2.07%	0.00%	51.58%
RVNL GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVNL and FBL in my portfolio?

RVNL and FBL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RVNL or FBL?

RVNL has higher volatility (37.10%) compared to FBL (21.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVNL dropped -72.92% vs FBL's -61.15%.

Which ETF is better, RVNL or FBL?

On 1-year performance, RVNL leads with -16.81% vs -39.76% for FBL. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, FBL has been the lower-risk option at 21.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RVNL or FBL?

Over the 1-year period, RVNL has performed better with a -16.81% return vs -39.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RVNL or FBL?

RVNL and FBL have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RVNL or FBL?

FBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.00% for RVNL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RVNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.