PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RVNL vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RVNL vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVNL achieves a -54.72% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 869.59% return.


RVNL

1D
-16.80%
1M
6.34%
YTD
-54.72%
6M
-63.02%
1Y
-27.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
10.62%
1M
28.51%
YTD
869.59%
6M
899.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVNL vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RVNL
GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF
-54.72%60.08%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
869.59%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RVNL and LINT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.23

RVNL vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RVNL
LINT

Consumer Cyclical

66.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

RVNL
66.7%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

RVNL

-

LINT

-

Communication Services

RVNL

-

LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

RVNL

-

LINT

-

Energy

RVNL

-

LINT

-

Financial Services

RVNL

-

LINT

-

Healthcare

RVNL

-

LINT

-

Industrials

RVNL

-

LINT

-

Real Estate

RVNL

-

LINT

-

Technology

RVNL

-

LINT
100.0%

Utilities

RVNL

-

LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RVNL vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVNL
RVNL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
RVNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVNL Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RVNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVNL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVNL vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RVNLLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.66

RVNL vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RVNL vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVNL drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNL and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RVNLLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.92%

-49.54%

-23.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.28%

0.00%

-65.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.79%

-20.53%

-20.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.46%

Volatility

RVNL vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RVNLLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

47.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

95.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

131.48%

168.26%

-36.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

126.64%

168.26%

-41.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

126.64%

168.26%

-41.62%

RVNL vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVNL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

RVNL vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

RVNL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RVNL and LINT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for RVNL.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for RVNL.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for RVNL and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RVNL and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer