RVER vs. FTIF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RVER (Trenchless Fund ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. RVER is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. Over the past year, RVER returned 17.51% vs 29.74% for FTIF. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RVER charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.

Performance

RVER vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVER achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 20.97% return.

RVER

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: 5.71%
• YTD: 11.38%
• 6M: 10.20%
• 1Y: 17.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTIF

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -2.83%
• YTD: 20.97%
• 6M: 19.74%
• 1Y: 29.74%
• 3Y*: 14.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVER vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RVER Trenchless Fund ETF	11.38%	5.68%	18.88%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	20.97%	7.79%	-10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between RVER and FTIF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024	0.51

The correlation between RVER and FTIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

RVER vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RVER	FTIF
Technology	60.8%	2.0%
Basic Materials	9.9%	22.0%
Energy	9.3%	38.0%
Industrials	7.3%	18.0%
Communication Services	6.7%	-
Healthcare	6.1%	-
Financial Services	4.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	4.0%
Utilities	2.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	14.0%

Return for Risk

RVER vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVER

RVER Risk / Return Rank: 21
RVER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
RVER Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
RVER Omega Ratio Rank: 22
RVER Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
RVER Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 72
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVER vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RVER	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	1.94	-1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	2.70	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.33	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	5.47	-4.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.19	15.23	-13.04

RVER vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVER Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVER and FTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RVER vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVER drawdown since its inception was -26.21%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVER and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVER	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.21%	-27.83%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.61%	-5.46%	-16.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.46%	-4.32%	-4.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.96%	-5.95%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.03%	1.96%	+6.07%

Volatility

RVER vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) has a higher volatility of 10.33% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 4.57%. This indicates that RVER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RVER	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.33%	4.57%	+5.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.23%	10.75%	+8.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.21%	15.38%	+7.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.42%	18.92%	+7.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.42%	18.92%	+7.50%

RVER vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVER has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RVER vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

RVER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than FTIF's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.15%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%
RVER Trenchless Fund ETF	1.53%	1.71%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVER and FTIF in my portfolio?

RVER and FTIF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RVER or FTIF?

RVER has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to FTIF (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVER dropped -26.21% vs FTIF's -27.83%.

Which ETF is better, RVER or FTIF?

On 1-year performance, FTIF leads with 29.74% vs 17.51% for RVER. On fees, FTIF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RVER or FTIF?

Over the 1-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 29.74% return vs 17.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RVER or FTIF?

FTIF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RVER.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RVER or FTIF?

RVER has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.15% for FTIF.

What is the main difference between RVER and FTIF?

They also come from different issuers: River1 and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RVER and 0.60% for FTIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.