PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RVER vs. VCLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RVER vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RVER vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RVER
Trenchless Fund ETF
-11.21%5.68%17.75%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
-0.63%7.18%1.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVER achieves a -11.21% return, which is significantly lower than VCLT's -0.63% return.


RVER

1D
4.11%
1M
-5.96%
YTD
-11.21%
6M
-14.57%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VCLT

1D
0.78%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
-1.73%
10Y*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RVER vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVER has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RVER vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVER
RVER Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
RVER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVER Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVER Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RVER Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVER Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VCLT
VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVER vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RVERVCLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.15

0.40

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.44

0.59

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.08

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

0.82

-0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.61

1.92

-1.31

RVER vs. VCLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVER Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the VCLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVER and VCLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RVERVCLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

0.40

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.39

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between RVER and VCLT is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RVER vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison

RVER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than VCLT's 5.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RVER
Trenchless Fund ETF
1.92%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.62%5.51%5.19%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%

Drawdowns

RVER vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVER drawdown since its inception was -26.21%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVER and VCLT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RVERVCLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.21%

-34.31%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.61%

-5.39%

-16.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.39%

-15.73%

-2.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-8.08%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.01%

2.32%

+4.69%

Volatility

RVER vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison

Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) at 3.98%. This indicates that RVER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RVERVCLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.51%

3.98%

+4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.04%

5.62%

+11.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.27%

10.22%

+18.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.29%

12.81%

+13.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.29%

12.84%

+13.45%