PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RVER vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RVER and BDGS is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

RVER vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
27.61%
9.06%
RVER
BDGS

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

RVER:

22.70%

BDGS:

5.25%

Max Drawdown

RVER:

-18.03%

BDGS:

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

RVER:

0.00%

BDGS:

-0.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVER achieves a 7.23% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 2.55% return.


RVER

YTD

7.23%

1M

5.67%

6M

28.66%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

2.55%

1M

0.87%

6M

9.10%

1Y

20.72%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RVER vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVER has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for RVER: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RVER vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVER

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RVER vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
RVER
BDGS


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

RVER vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

RVER has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.


TTM20242023
RVER
Trenchless Fund ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.77%1.81%0.84%

Drawdowns

RVER vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVER drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVER and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
-0.15%
RVER
BDGS

Volatility

RVER vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.22%. This indicates that RVER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.09%
1.22%
RVER
BDGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab