RVER vs. ZROZ
RVER (Trenchless Fund ETF) and ZROZ (PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RVER is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by River1, while ZROZ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Long U.S. Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. RVER is actively managed, while ZROZ is passively managed. Over the past year, RVER returned 19.17% vs -6.42% for ZROZ. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RVER charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZROZ.
Performance
RVER vs. ZROZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RVER achieves a 17.32% return, which is significantly higher than ZROZ's -5.76% return.
RVER
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- 6M
- 20.42%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 1Y
- 19.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.07%
ZROZ
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- 6M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- -5.76%
- 1Y
- -6.42%
- 3Y*
- -6.53%
- 5Y*
- -14.34%
- 10Y*
- -5.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $341.09K | $290.57K | $289.27K | |
| $41.39M | $45.56M | $40.46M |
RVER vs. ZROZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RVER Trenchless Fund ETF | 17.32% | 5.68% | 18.88% |
ZROZ PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund | -5.76% | -1.84% | -6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between RVER and ZROZ is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RVER vs. ZROZ — Risk / Return Rank
RVER
ZROZ
RVER vs. ZROZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RVER | ZROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.94 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | -0.43 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.25 | -0.88 | +3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RVER vs. ZROZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RVER drawdown since its inception was -26.21%, smaller than the maximum ZROZ drawdown of -62.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVER and ZROZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RVER | ZROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.21% | -62.93% | +36.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.61% | -14.90% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -61.83% | +58.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -24.40% | +18.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.55% | 7.28% | +1.27% |
Volatility
RVER vs. ZROZ - Volatility Comparison
Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) has a higher volatility of 9.97% compared to PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ) at 4.48%. This indicates that RVER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZROZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RVER | ZROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.97% | 4.48% | +5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.51% | 11.09% | +9.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.83% | 15.38% | +9.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.60% | 23.77% | +2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.60% | 21.96% | +4.64% |
RVER vs. ZROZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RVER has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ZROZ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RVER vs. ZROZ - Dividend Comparison
RVER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than ZROZ's 5.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVER Trenchless Fund ETF | 1.45% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZROZ PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund | 5.51% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.76% | 1.60% | 1.68% | 2.22% | 2.06% | 2.53% | 3.00% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RVER and ZROZ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RVER has higher volatility (9.97%) compared to ZROZ (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVER dropped -26.21% vs ZROZ's -62.93%.
On 1-year performance, RVER leads with 19.17% vs -6.42% for ZROZ. On fees, ZROZ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZROZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RVER has performed better with a 19.17% return vs -6.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZROZ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RVER.
ZROZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.51%, compared with 1.45% for RVER.
RVER is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ZROZ is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: River1 and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RVER and 0.15% for ZROZ.
RVER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RVER and ZROZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer