RUM vs. CLSE
RUM (Rumble Inc.) is a stock, while CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) is Long-Short fund actively managed by Convergence Investment Partners. Over the past 3 years, RUM returned -5.91%/yr vs 32.39%/yr for CLSE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RUM vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUM achieves a 31.80% return, which is significantly higher than CLSE's 25.76% return.
RUM
- 1D
- -7.13%
- 1M
- 17.32%
- YTD
- 31.80%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- -5.56%
- 3Y*
- -5.91%
- 5Y*
- -3.11%
- 10Y*
- —
CLSE
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 25.76%
- 6M
- 28.57%
- 1Y
- 50.91%
- 3Y*
- 32.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RUM vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUM Rumble Inc. | 31.80% | -51.42% | 189.76% | -24.54% | -54.72% |
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 25.76% | 20.44% | 35.54% | 17.54% | -3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between RUM and CLSE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2022 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RUM vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank
RUM
CLSE
RUM vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rumble Inc. (RUM) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RUM | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.67 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 10.55 | -10.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | 39.58 | -39.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RUM | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 3.84 | -3.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 1.59 | -1.63 |
Drawdowns
RUM vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUM drawdown since its inception was -79.83%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUM and CLSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUM | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.83% | -16.45% | -63.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.39% | -4.85% | -48.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.30% | -16.45% | -54.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.45% | 0.00% | -50.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.07% | -3.59% | -40.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.59% | 1.29% | +30.30% |
Volatility
RUM vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison
Rumble Inc. (RUM) has a higher volatility of 30.60% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 4.31%. This indicates that RUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RUM | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.60% | 4.31% | +26.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.14% | 10.21% | +43.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.32% | 13.32% | +57.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.65% | 13.88% | +71.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.49% | 13.88% | +70.61% |
Dividends
RUM vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison
RUM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.76% | 0.95% | 0.93% | 1.21% | 0.85% |
RUM Rumble Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RUM and CLSE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RUM has higher volatility (30.60%) compared to CLSE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RUM dropped -79.83% vs CLSE's -16.45%.
CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RUM and CLSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer