RUM vs. EME
RUM (Rumble Inc.) and EME (EMCOR Group, Inc.) are both stocks. RUM operates in Software - Application (Technology), while EME operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, RUM returned -3.11%/yr vs 46.30%/yr for EME. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RUM vs. EME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUM achieves a 31.80% return, which is significantly lower than EME's 37.38% return.
RUM
- 1D
- -7.13%
- 1M
- 17.32%
- YTD
- 31.80%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- -5.56%
- 3Y*
- -5.91%
- 5Y*
- -3.11%
- 10Y*
- —
EME
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- 37.38%
- 6M
- 37.33%
- 1Y
- 73.87%
- 3Y*
- 69.67%
- 5Y*
- 46.30%
- 10Y*
- 33.77%
RUM vs. EME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUM Rumble Inc. | 31.80% | -51.42% | 189.76% | -24.54% | -45.06% | 11.08% |
EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 37.38% | 35.05% | 111.27% | 46.03% | 16.81% | 8.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between RUM and EME is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
RUM:
-$0.56
EME:
$29.65
RUM:
15.78
EME:
2.13
RUM:
$102.38M
EME:
$17.75B
RUM:
$23.52M
EME:
$3.47B
RUM:
-$57.49M
EME:
$2.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RUM vs. EME — Risk / Return Rank
RUM
EME
RUM vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rumble Inc. (RUM) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RUM | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.35 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 2.95 | -3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | 7.46 | -7.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RUM | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 1.96 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 1.40 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.60 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
RUM vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUM drawdown since its inception was -79.83%, which is greater than EME's maximum drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUM and EME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUM | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.83% | -70.56% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.39% | -25.15% | -28.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.30% | -36.19% | -35.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.83% | -36.19% | -43.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.45% | -11.04% | -39.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.07% | -15.37% | -28.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.59% | 9.94% | +21.65% |
Volatility
RUM vs. EME - Volatility Comparison
Rumble Inc. (RUM) has a higher volatility of 30.60% compared to EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) at 7.27%. This indicates that RUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RUM | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.60% | 7.27% | +23.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.14% | 25.45% | +28.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.32% | 37.97% | +32.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.65% | 33.27% | +52.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.49% | 32.94% | +51.55% |
Dividends
RUM vs. EME - Dividend Comparison
RUM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.20% | 0.32% | 0.36% | 0.41% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.67% |
RUM Rumble Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RUM vs. EME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rumble Inc. and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RUM and EME have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RUM has higher volatility (30.60%) compared to EME (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RUM dropped -79.83% vs EME's -70.56%.
EME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RUM and EME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer