RUM vs. EME

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Rumble Inc. (RUM) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME).

Performance

RUM vs. EME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rumble Inc. (RUM) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RUM vs. EME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RUM Rumble Inc.	-20.73%	-51.42%	189.76%	-24.54%	-45.06%	11.08%
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	24.23%	35.05%	111.27%	46.03%	16.81%	8.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RUM : $1.31B EME : $34.22B
EPS RUM : -$0.31 EME : $28.22
PS Ratio RUM : 0.00 EME : 2.01
Total Revenue (TTM) RUM : $100.62T EME : $16.99B
Gross Profit (TTM) RUM : $14.24T EME : $3.33B
EBITDA (TTM) RUM : -$98.55M EME : $1.84B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RUM achieves a -20.73% return, which is significantly lower than EME's 24.23% return.

RUM

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: -8.91%
• YTD: -20.73%
• 6M: -29.93%
• 1Y: -34.94%
• 3Y*: -20.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EME

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 24.23%
• 6M: 16.09%
• 1Y: 102.70%
• 3Y*: 67.63%
• 5Y*: 46.72%
• 10Y*: 32.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RUM vs. EME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RUM

RUM Risk / Return Rank: 21
RUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
RUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
RUM Omega Ratio Rank: 20
RUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
RUM Martin Ratio Rank: 25

EME

EME Risk / Return Rank: 91
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RUM vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rumble Inc. (RUM) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RUM	EME	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	2.56	-3.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	2.84	-3.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.43	-0.49
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	4.21	-4.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.91	10.89	-11.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RUM vs. EME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RUM Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the EME Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RUM and EME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RUM	EME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.53	2.56	-3.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	0.59	-0.74

Correlation

The correlation between RUM and EME is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RUM vs. EME - Dividend Comparison

RUM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RUM Rumble Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	0.15%	0.16%	0.20%	0.32%	0.36%	0.41%	0.35%	0.37%	0.54%	0.39%	0.45%	0.67%

Drawdowns

RUM vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RUM drawdown since its inception was -79.83%, which is greater than EME's maximum drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUM and EME.

Drawdown Indicators

	RUM	EME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.83%	-70.56%	-9.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.78%	-25.15%	-30.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.20%	-6.55%	-63.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.61%	-15.43%	-28.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.97%	9.73%	+22.24%

Volatility

RUM vs. EME - Volatility Comparison

Rumble Inc. (RUM) has a higher volatility of 21.56% compared to EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) at 11.93%. This indicates that RUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RUM	EME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.56%	11.93%	+9.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.86%	32.55%	+17.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.28%	40.30%	+26.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.92%	32.91%	+51.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.92%	32.76%	+51.16%

Financials