RTH vs. ISHP
RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) and ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - RTH tracks the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index while ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RTH returned 9.36%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for ISHP. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RTH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ISHP.
Performance
RTH vs. ISHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than ISHP's -12.76% return.
RTH
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 7.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
ISHP
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -12.24%
- 1Y
- -9.78%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- —
RTH vs. ISHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 1.87% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -12.76% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -2.04% | 7.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and ISHP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2016 | 0.61 |
The correlation between RTH and ISHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RTH vs. ISHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RTH
ISHP
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
RTH
ISHP
Consumer Defensive
RTH
ISHP
Healthcare
RTH
ISHP
Industrials
RTH
ISHP
Basic Materials
RTH
-
ISHP
-
Communication Services
RTH
-
ISHP
Energy
RTH
-
ISHP
-
Financial Services
RTH
-
ISHP
Real Estate
RTH
-
ISHP
Technology
RTH
-
ISHP
Utilities
RTH
-
ISHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTH vs. ISHP — Risk / Return Rank
RTH
ISHP
RTH vs. ISHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTH | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | -0.57 | +1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | -0.69 | +1.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.92 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.40 | +1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | -0.85 | +4.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTH | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | -0.57 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.04 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.29 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
RTH vs. ISHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum ISHP drawdown of -47.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and ISHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTH | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -47.57% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -24.75% | +16.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -24.75% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.00% | -47.57% | +22.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -19.86% | +14.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -12.66% | +5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 11.46% | -9.20% |
Volatility
RTH vs. ISHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) is 3.83%, while First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that RTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTH | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 4.32% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 13.42% | -4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 17.23% | -5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 27.29% | -10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 24.10% | -6.56% |
RTH vs. ISHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ISHP's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTH vs. ISHP - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than ISHP's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.53% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% | 0.00% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.95% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTH and ISHP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISHP has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to RTH (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTH dropped -42.32% vs ISHP's -47.57%.
On 5-year performance, RTH leads with 9.36% vs 1.20% for ISHP. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RTH has performed better with a 9.36% return vs 1.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.95% for RTH.
RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RTH and 0.60% for ISHP.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RTH and ISHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer