RSSX vs. FNGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).

RSSX and FNGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSSX is an actively managed fund by Return Stacked. It was launched on May 29, 2025. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019.

Performance

RSSX vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RSSX vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSSX Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF	-7.94%	29.82%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	-12.40%	13.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSX achieves a -7.94% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's -12.40% return.

RSSX

• 1D: 5.88%
• 1M: -12.18%
• YTD: -7.94%
• 6M: -6.25%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGS

• 1D: 4.69%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: -12.40%
• 6M: -14.82%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 30.42%
• 5Y*: 15.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSX vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

RSSX

Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF

FNGS

MicroSectors FANG+ ETN

Return for Risk

RSSX vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 41
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSX vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSSX	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.90	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between RSSX and FNGS is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RSSX vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

RSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
RSSX Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF	1.68%	1.54%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RSSX vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSX drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSX and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSX	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.37%	-48.98%	+21.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-22.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.10%	-19.32%	-3.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-11.02%	+5.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSSX	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.68%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.26%	26.98%	+5.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.26%	29.97%	+2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.26%	31.34%	+0.92%