RSSX vs. VOO
RSSX (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. RSSX is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past year, RSSX returned 28.58% vs 28.04% for VOO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSSX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
RSSX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSSX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.
RSSX
- 1D
- -2.19%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 28.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
RSSX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSSX Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF | 1.26% | 29.82% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 16.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSSX and VOO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025 | 0.68 |
The correlation between RSSX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSSX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
RSSX
VOO
RSSX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSSX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.43 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 3.16 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 14.73 | -11.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSSX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 2.39 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.89 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
RSSX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSSX drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSX and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSSX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.37% | -33.99% | +6.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.37% | -8.90% | -18.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.42% | -0.70% | -14.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -3.69% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.49% | 1.91% | +7.58% |
Volatility
RSSX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that RSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSSX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.93% | 2.84% | +5.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.82% | 8.90% | +17.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.81% | 11.80% | +20.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.80% | 16.81% | +14.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.80% | 18.01% | +13.79% |
RSSX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSSX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSSX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
RSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSSX Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF | 1.52% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSSX and VOO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSSX has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSX dropped -27.37% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 1-year performance, RSSX leads with 28.58% vs 28.04% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSSX has performed better with a 28.58% return vs 28.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for RSSX.
RSSX has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
RSSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for RSSX and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSSX and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer