PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSSE vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSSE vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September (RSSE) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSE achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 19.24% return.


RSSE

1D
0.34%
1M
1.40%
6M
7.93%
YTD
10.21%
1Y
14.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.51%

FDL

1D
0.52%
1M
4.21%
6M
8.54%
YTD
19.24%
1Y
28.21%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
14.12%
10Y*
11.14%
ALL TIME*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$50.65M$49.05M$43.27M
$87.23K$92.56K$78.59K

RSSE vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSSE and FDL is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2024

0.62

The correlation between RSSE and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSSE vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSSE
RSSE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RSSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSSE vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September (RSSE) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSSEFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

6.63

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

15.64

-3.05

RSSE vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSE and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSSE vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSE drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSE and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSSEFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-65.93%

+54.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.38%

-4.27%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.07%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-9.59%

+8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.81%

-0.66%

Volatility

RSSE vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September (RSSE) is 1.42%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that RSSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSSEFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

4.55%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.01%

8.76%

-3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.57%

11.87%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.92%

14.43%

-4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.92%

17.16%

-7.24%

RSSE vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSSE vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

RSSE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.56%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
RSSE
FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSSE and FDL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to RSSE (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSE dropped -11.37% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 1-year performance, FDL leads with 28.21% vs 14.40% for RSSE. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, RSSE has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDL has performed better with a 28.21% return vs 14.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for RSSE.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.00% for RSSE.

RSSE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for RSSE and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSSE and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer