RSSE vs. QB

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RSSE (FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. RSSE is actively managed, while QB is passively managed. Over the past year, RSSE returned 14.40% vs 22.04% for QB. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RSSE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.

Performance

RSSE vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September (RSSE) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSE achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 15.61% return.

RSSE

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.40%
• 6M: 7.93%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 1Y: 14.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.51%

QB

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 4.09%
• 6M: 15.00%
• YTD: 15.61%
• 1Y: 22.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	$54.67K	$35.27K	$152.35K
RSSE FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September	$87.23K	$92.56K	$78.59K

RSSE vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSSE FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September	10.21%	5.78%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	15.61%	6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSE and QB is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

RSSE vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSSE

RSSE Risk / Return Rank: 79
RSSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RSSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
RSSE Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RSSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
RSSE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

QB

QB Risk / Return Rank: 96
QB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
QB Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
QB Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QB Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
QB Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSSE vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September (RSSE) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSSE	QB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	3.05	-1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	4.54	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.73	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	6.37	-3.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	30.57	-17.98

RSSE vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the QB Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSE and QB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSSE vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSE drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSE and QB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSE	QB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-3.47%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.38%	-3.47%	-0.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.46%	-0.41%	-1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	0.72%	+0.43%

Volatility

RSSE vs. QB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September (RSSE) is 1.42%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) has a volatility of 2.40%. This indicates that RSSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSSE	QB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	2.40%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.01%	6.11%	-1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.57%	7.29%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.92%	7.05%	+2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.92%	7.05%	+2.87%

RSSE vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSSE vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

RSSE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.

Position	TTM	2025
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.75%	0.48%
RSSE FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSE and QB in my portfolio?

RSSE and QB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSSE or QB?

QB has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to RSSE (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSE dropped -11.37% vs QB's -3.47%.

Which ETF is better, RSSE or QB?

On 1-year performance, QB leads with 22.04% vs 14.40% for RSSE. On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, RSSE has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSSE or QB?

Over the 1-year period, QB has performed better with a 22.04% return vs 14.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSE or QB?

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for RSSE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSE or QB?

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for RSSE.

What is the main difference between RSSE and QB?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for RSSE and 0.58% for QB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.