RSPT vs. SPYG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPT returned 20.69%/yr vs 17.52%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RSPT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.

Performance

RSPT vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 34.90% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has outperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 20.69%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.52% annualized return.

RSPT

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -0.11%
• 6M: 28.39%
• YTD: 34.90%
• 1Y: 50.97%
• 3Y*: 28.61%
• 5Y*: 15.94%
• 10Y*: 20.69%
• ALL TIME*: 14.53%

SPYG

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: 2.10%
• 6M: 11.46%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 1Y: 24.33%
• 3Y*: 25.98%
• 5Y*: 13.61%
• 10Y*: 17.52%
• ALL TIME*: 7.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	$34.86M	$46.20M	$44.03M
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	$323.67M	$273.71M	$308.17M

RSPT vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	34.90%	22.15%	15.16%	35.18%	-24.50%	28.53%	30.21%	42.07%	-0.61%	32.98%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	12.43%	22.09%	35.99%	30.02%	-29.41%	32.01%	33.46%	30.84%	-0.12%	27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and SPYG is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006	0.85

The correlation between RSPT and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPT vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPT	SPYG
Technology	98.7%	52.3%
Communication Services	1.3%	15.6%
Energy	1.3%	0.1%
Industrials	0.8%	6.4%
Financial Services	0.0%	8.7%
Basic Materials	-	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.0%
Healthcare	-	6.2%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Utilities	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

RSPT vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 82
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 53
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPT vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPT	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.34	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	1.93	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.24	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	1.78	+2.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.13	6.45	+4.69

RSPT vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and SPYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPT	SPYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.91%	-67.63%	+8.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.29%	-13.76%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.62%	-22.14%	-4.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	-32.67%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.67%	-32.67%	-1.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.11%	-2.28%	-6.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.89%	-24.20%	+15.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.59%	3.78%	+0.81%

Volatility

RSPT vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) have volatilities of 6.66% and 6.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPT	SPYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.66%	6.35%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.51%	14.96%	+5.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.91%	18.23%	+6.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.74%	21.53%	+3.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.01%	20.81%	+3.20%

RSPT vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPT vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than SPYG's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.27%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.48%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPT and SPYG in my portfolio?

RSPT and SPYG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPT or SPYG?

RSPT has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to SPYG (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

Which ETF is better, RSPT or SPYG?

On 10-year performance, RSPT leads with 20.69% vs 17.52% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPT or SPYG?

Over the 10-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 20.69% return vs 17.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPT or SPYG?

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPT or SPYG?

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.27% for RSPT.

What is the main difference between RSPT and SPYG?

RSPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.04% for SPYG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.