PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPT vs. MGK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPT vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 38.00% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has outperformed MGK with an annualized return of 21.84%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively lower 18.85% annualized return.


RSPT

1D
1.46%
1M
6.83%
YTD
38.00%
6M
36.68%
1Y
63.04%
3Y*
29.59%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
21.84%

MGK

1D
0.22%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
5.33%
6M
6.21%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
18.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
38.00%22.15%15.16%35.18%-24.50%28.53%30.21%42.07%-0.61%32.98%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
5.33%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and MGK is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.85

The correlation between RSPT and MGK shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPT vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPT
MGK

Technology

97.4%
56.1%

Energy

1.5%

-

Industrials

1.1%
1.1%

Financial Services

0.0%
4.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Communication Services

-

17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.4%

Healthcare

-

4.5%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Technology

RSPT
97.4%
MGK
56.1%

Energy

RSPT
1.5%
MGK

-

Industrials

RSPT
1.1%
MGK
1.1%

Financial Services

RSPT
0.0%
MGK
4.5%

Basic Materials

RSPT

-

MGK
0.7%

Communication Services

RSPT

-

MGK
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPT

-

MGK
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

RSPT

-

MGK
0.4%

Healthcare

RSPT

-

MGK
4.5%

Real Estate

RSPT

-

MGK
1.3%

Utilities

RSPT

-

MGK
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPT vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT
RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPTMGKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

1.37

+3.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.68

4.65

+14.03

RSPT vs. MGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and MGK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and MGK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPTMGKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-48.43%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-16.85%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-23.36%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-36.01%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-36.01%

+2.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.02%

-5.63%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-7.58%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

4.97%

-1.73%

Volatility

RSPT vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 5.96%. This indicates that RSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPTMGKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.32%

5.96%

+5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.35%

13.29%

+6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.22%

16.87%

+6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.38%

22.72%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

21.93%

+1.99%

RSPT vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPT vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than MGK's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
0.27%0.39%0.44%0.56%0.71%0.50%1.29%0.92%0.98%0.84%1.16%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPT and MGK have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPT has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs MGK's -48.43%.

On 10-year performance, RSPT leads with 21.84% vs 18.85% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 21.84% return vs 18.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.27% for RSPT.

RSPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.05% for MGK.

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPT and MGK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer