RSPT vs. GXPT
RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - RSPT tracks the S&P 500® Information Technology Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
RSPT vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 37.17% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 16.86% return.
RSPT
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 37.17%
- 6M
- 34.77%
- 1Y
- 59.82%
- 3Y*
- 30.81%
- 5Y*
- 17.50%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
GXPT
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPT vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 37.17% | 9.96% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 16.86% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPT and GXPT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPT vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
RSPT
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPT vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.83 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPT vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -18.74% | -40.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.58% | -8.72% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -5.04% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPT vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.79% | 22.91% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.52% | 22.91% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.94% | 22.91% | +1.03% |
RSPT vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPT vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than GXPT's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 0.26% | 0.39% | 0.44% | 0.56% | 0.71% | 0.50% | 1.29% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 1.16% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPT and GXPT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.
RSPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.12% for GXPT.
RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for RSPT and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer