RSPT vs. ARMH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH).

RSPT and ARMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPT is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® Information Technology Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2006. ARMH is an actively managed fund by Precidian. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

RSPT vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RSPT vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	-0.46%	34.58%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	39.97%	-2.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than ARMH's 39.97% return.

RSPT

• 1D: 4.02%
• 1M: -3.99%
• YTD: -0.46%
• 6M: 1.70%
• 1Y: 32.86%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: 11.01%
• 10Y*: 17.92%

ARMH

• 1D: 9.71%
• 1M: 20.77%
• YTD: 39.97%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

RSPT

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

ARMH

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

Return for Risk

RSPT vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 76
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 70
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPT	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.94	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPT	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.80	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and ARMH is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RSPT vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than ARMH's 2.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.38%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	2.42%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -42.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPT	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.91%	-42.04%	-16.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.08%	-13.75%	+6.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.97%	-16.33%	+7.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSPT	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.17%	50.59%	-23.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.84%	50.59%	-26.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.59%	50.59%	-27.00%