RSPS vs. VT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.15%/yr vs 12.74%/yr for VT. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

RSPS vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 4.15%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.

RSPS

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 0.96%
• 1Y: -1.56%
• 3Y*: -1.72%
• 5Y*: -0.01%
• 10Y*: 4.15%

VT

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 29.24%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 12.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPS vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	1.64%	-0.88%	-1.47%	-5.39%	2.88%	14.68%	6.19%	28.17%	-10.86%	14.20%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	12.24%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPS and VT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between RSPS and VT has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RSPS vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPS	VT
Consumer Defensive	96.9%	4.8%
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	9.5%
Financial Services	0.0%	15.9%
Basic Materials	-	4.2%
Communication Services	-	8.3%
Energy	-	4.3%
Healthcare	-	8.1%
Industrials	-	12.0%
Real Estate	-	2.4%
Technology	-	27.8%
Utilities	-	2.7%

Return for Risk

RSPS vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPS

RSPS Risk / Return Rank: 7
RSPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RSPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
RSPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7
RSPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RSPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 67
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPS vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPS	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	2.31	-2.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.07	3.20	-3.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.42	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	3.04	-3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.26	13.53	-13.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPS vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPS and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPS	VT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12	2.31	-2.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.69	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.74	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.44	+0.13

Drawdowns

RSPS vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPS	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.93%	-50.27%	+14.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.72%	-9.67%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-16.51%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.61%	-26.38%	+7.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.42%	-34.24%	+8.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.26%	-0.88%	-10.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.05%	-7.02%	+1.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.13%	2.17%	+3.96%

Volatility

RSPS vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) have volatilities of 3.69% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPS	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.69%	3.83%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.14%	10.17%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.51%	12.70%	+0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.60%	16.05%	-2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.87%	17.23%	-2.36%

RSPS vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPS vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	2.87%	2.82%	2.86%	2.78%	2.31%	2.07%	2.14%	2.12%	2.43%	1.90%	1.76%	1.77%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPS and VT in my portfolio?

RSPS and VT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPS or VT?

VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to RSPS (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which ETF is better, RSPS or VT?

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.74% vs 4.15% for RSPS. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RSPS has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPS or VT?

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPS or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPS or VT?

RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

What is the main difference between RSPS and VT?

RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VT is Global Equities. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.06% for VT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.