RSPS vs. FXG

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and FXG (First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - RSPS tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC while FXG tracks the StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.16%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for FXG. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FXG.

Performance

RSPS vs. FXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly higher than FXG's 6.07% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed FXG with an annualized return of 4.16%, while FXG has yielded a comparatively higher 4.54% annualized return.

RSPS

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -0.66%
• 6M: 4.68%
• YTD: 6.59%
• 1Y: 3.58%
• 3Y*: -0.19%
• 5Y*: 1.65%
• 10Y*: 4.16%

FXG

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: 0.52%
• 6M: 4.30%
• YTD: 6.07%
• 1Y: 2.82%
• 3Y*: 2.52%
• 5Y*: 4.31%
• 10Y*: 4.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPS vs. FXG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	6.59%	-0.88%	-1.47%	-5.39%	2.88%	14.68%	6.19%	28.17%	-10.86%	14.20%
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund	6.07%	-2.66%	3.21%	1.97%	3.28%	21.73%	4.85%	20.65%	-11.49%	7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPS and FXG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007	0.82

The correlation between RSPS and FXG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPS vs. FXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPS	FXG
Consumer Defensive	97.1%	79.6%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	8.2%
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	2.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Industrials	-	4.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPS vs. FXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPS

RSPS Risk / Return Rank: 13
RSPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
RSPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RSPS Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RSPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RSPS Martin Ratio Rank: 12

FXG

FXG Risk / Return Rank: 12
FXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
FXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
FXG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
FXG Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPS vs. FXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPS	FXG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	0.19	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	0.37	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.04	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.29	0.21	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.51	0.43	+0.08

RSPS vs. FXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is comparable to the FXG Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPS and FXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPS vs. FXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum FXG drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and FXG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPS	FXG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.93%	-38.69%	+2.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.72%	-12.75%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-12.75%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.61%	-15.70%	-2.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.42%	-27.54%	+2.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.94%	-7.23%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.06%	-6.04%	+0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	6.10%	+0.51%

Volatility

RSPS vs. FXG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) have volatilities of 5.79% and 5.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPS	FXG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	5.57%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.41%	10.48%	+0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.35%	13.63%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.80%	13.66%	+0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	14.97%	-0.04%

RSPS vs. FXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FXG's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPS vs. FXG - Dividend Comparison

RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than FXG's 2.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund	2.40%	2.83%	1.70%	1.41%	1.83%	1.38%	1.41%	1.63%	2.31%	1.34%	1.72%	1.67%
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	2.92%	2.82%	2.86%	2.78%	2.31%	2.07%	2.14%	2.12%	2.43%	1.90%	1.76%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPS and FXG in my portfolio?

RSPS and FXG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPS or FXG?

RSPS has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to FXG (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs FXG's -38.69%.

Which ETF is better, RSPS or FXG?

On 10-year performance, FXG leads with 4.54% vs 4.16% for RSPS. On fees, RSPS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FXG has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPS or FXG?

Over the 10-year period, FXG has performed better with a 4.54% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPS or FXG?

RSPS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPS or FXG?

RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 2.40% for FXG.

What is the main difference between RSPS and FXG?

RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.63% for FXG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.