FXG vs. RSP
FXG (First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXG is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXG returned 4.76%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for RSP. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXG charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
FXG vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXG achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FXG has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 4.76%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.
FXG
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- -0.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.76%
RSP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 18.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
FXG vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 3.65% | -2.66% | 3.21% | 1.97% | 3.28% | 21.73% | 4.85% | 20.65% | -11.49% | 7.87% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.72% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXG and RSP is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FXG and RSP has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FXG vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXG
RSP
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
FXG
RSP
Healthcare
FXG
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
FXG
RSP
Industrials
FXG
RSP
Basic Materials
FXG
RSP
Communication Services
FXG
-
RSP
Energy
FXG
-
RSP
Financial Services
FXG
-
RSP
Real Estate
FXG
-
RSP
Technology
FXG
-
RSP
Utilities
FXG
-
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXG vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
FXG
RSP
FXG vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXG | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.28 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 2.39 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 9.03 | -9.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXG vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXG drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXG and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXG | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -59.92% | +21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -7.85% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.75% | -17.81% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.70% | -21.38% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.54% | -39.04% | +11.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.34% | -0.79% | -8.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -6.64% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.90% | 2.08% | +3.82% |
Volatility
FXG vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 3.59%. This indicates that FXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXG | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 3.59% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 8.69% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 11.81% | +1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.59% | 16.20% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 18.33% | -3.36% |
FXG vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXG vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
FXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than RSP's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 2.79% | 2.83% | 1.70% | 1.41% | 1.83% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.63% | 2.31% | 1.34% | 1.72% | 1.67% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXG and RSP have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXG has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to RSP (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXG dropped -38.69% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 12.31% vs 4.76% for FXG. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 12.31% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXG.
FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.52% for RSP.
FXG is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXG and 0.20% for RSP.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXG and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer