PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXG vs. CLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXG vs. CLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXG achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than CLIX's -3.95% return.


FXG

1D
-0.22%
1M
-6.27%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
-2.62%
3Y*
0.91%
5Y*
1.88%
10Y*
4.22%

CLIX

1D
-0.88%
1M
-3.59%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-4.31%
1Y
16.32%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
-5.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXG vs. CLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
-0.24%-2.66%3.21%1.97%3.28%21.73%4.85%20.65%-11.49%5.46%
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
-3.95%32.81%20.73%28.97%-46.73%-39.96%90.91%17.32%6.34%-2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FXG and CLIX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2017

0.10

The correlation between FXG and CLIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXG vs. CLIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXG
CLIX

Consumer Defensive

79.9%
1.6%

Healthcare

8.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
94.8%

Industrials

4.1%

-

Basic Materials

2.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

3.6%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

FXG
79.9%
CLIX
1.6%

Healthcare

FXG
8.2%
CLIX

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXG
7.9%
CLIX
94.8%

Industrials

FXG
4.1%
CLIX

-

Basic Materials

FXG
2.0%
CLIX

-

Communication Services

FXG

-

CLIX

-

Energy

FXG

-

CLIX

-

Financial Services

FXG

-

CLIX

-

Real Estate

FXG

-

CLIX

-

Technology

FXG

-

CLIX
3.6%

Utilities

FXG

-

CLIX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXG vs. CLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXG
FXG Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CLIX
CLIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXG vs. CLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXGCLIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.21

0.79

-1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.20

1.19

-1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.14

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

0.89

-1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.57

2.44

-3.01

FXG vs. CLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXG Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the CLIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXG and CLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXGCLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

0.79

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

-0.22

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.18

+0.29

Drawdowns

FXG vs. CLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXG drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, smaller than the maximum CLIX drawdown of -73.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXG and CLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXGCLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-73.21%

+34.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-19.57%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.75%

-21.18%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.70%

-68.22%

+52.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.75%

-43.26%

+30.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-34.70%

+28.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.35%

7.13%

-1.78%

Volatility

FXG vs. CLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) is 3.26%, while ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that FXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXGCLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

4.75%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

15.44%

-6.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

20.77%

-8.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

26.95%

-13.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

25.92%

-10.99%

FXG vs. CLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than CLIX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXG vs. CLIX - Dividend Comparison

FXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than CLIX's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
0.55%0.46%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
2.90%2.83%1.70%1.41%1.83%1.38%1.41%1.63%2.31%1.34%1.72%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXG and CLIX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLIX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to FXG (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXG dropped -38.69% vs CLIX's -73.21%.

On 5-year performance, FXG leads with 1.88% vs -5.94% for CLIX. On fees, FXG is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, FXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FXG has performed better with a 1.88% return vs -5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXG is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CLIX.

FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.55% for CLIX.

FXG is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while CLIX is Long-Short. FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while CLIX tracks ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXG and 0.65% for CLIX.

CLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXG and CLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer