RSPS vs. FTXG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and FTXG (First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - RSPS tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC while FTXG tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPS returned 1.13%/yr vs -0.40%/yr for FTXG. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXG.

Performance

RSPS vs. FTXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than FTXG's 4.86% return.

RSPS

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 2.63%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 1.13%
• 3Y*: -1.48%
• 5Y*: 1.13%
• 10Y*: 4.24%

FTXG

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: 4.86%
• 6M: 3.69%
• 1Y: 0.50%
• 3Y*: -3.02%
• 5Y*: -0.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPS vs. FTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	2.63%	-0.88%	-1.47%	-5.39%	2.88%	14.68%	6.19%	28.17%	-10.86%	14.20%
FTXG First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF	4.86%	-6.52%	-2.52%	-6.48%	6.15%	13.48%	6.63%	23.97%	-12.09%	5.64%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPS and FTXG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2016	0.70

Over the past year, RSPS and FTXG have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.70, meaning their price movements have been converging.

RSPS vs. FTXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPS	FTXG
Consumer Defensive	97.1%	94.3%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	4.2%
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPS vs. FTXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPS

RSPS Risk / Return Rank: 9
RSPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
RSPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
RSPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9
RSPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
RSPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9

FTXG

FTXG Risk / Return Rank: 9
FTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPS vs. FTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPS	FTXG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.08	0.04	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.21	0.15	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.02	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	0.05	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.18	0.09	+0.09

RSPS vs. FTXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is higher than the FTXG Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPS and FTXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPS vs. FTXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, which is greater than FTXG's maximum drawdown of -31.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and FTXG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPS	FTXG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.93%	-31.52%	-4.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.72%	-10.14%	-1.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-18.10%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.61%	-21.68%	+3.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.40%	-15.57%	+5.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.05%	-7.67%	+2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.41%	5.57%	+0.84%

Volatility

RSPS vs. FTXG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) at 4.27%. This indicates that RSPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPS	FTXG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	4.27%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.80%	10.07%	+0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.95%	13.94%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.68%	14.48%	-0.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.92%	16.62%	-1.70%

RSPS vs. FTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPS vs. FTXG - Dividend Comparison

RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than FTXG's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTXG First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF	2.78%	2.93%	2.75%	4.27%	1.50%	1.52%	1.35%	1.25%	1.37%	1.56%	0.30%	0.00%
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	3.67%	2.82%	2.86%	2.78%	2.31%	2.07%	2.14%	2.12%	2.43%	1.90%	1.76%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPS and FTXG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, RSPS and FTXG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RSPS or FTXG?

RSPS has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to FTXG (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs FTXG's -31.52%.

Which ETF is better, RSPS or FTXG?

On 5-year performance, RSPS leads with 1.13% vs -0.40% for FTXG. On fees, RSPS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FTXG has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPS or FTXG?

Over the 5-year period, RSPS has performed better with a 1.13% return vs -0.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPS or FTXG?

RSPS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPS or FTXG?

RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 2.78% for FTXG.

What is the main difference between RSPS and FTXG?

RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while FTXG tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.60% for FTXG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.