PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPN vs. VIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPN vs. VIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPN achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 19.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPN having a 15.13% annualized return and VIS not far behind at 14.85%.


RSPN

1D
0.31%
1M
4.48%
YTD
11.03%
6M
9.28%
1Y
22.27%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
15.13%

VIS

1D
0.66%
1M
5.89%
YTD
19.57%
6M
17.53%
1Y
33.16%
3Y*
23.08%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
14.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPN vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF
11.03%13.84%17.63%22.32%-8.79%26.07%18.07%33.17%-13.23%23.22%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
19.57%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPN and VIS is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006

0.89

The correlation between RSPN and VIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPN vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPN
VIS

Industrials

92.1%
90.2%

Technology

3.8%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
1.1%

Utilities

1.6%
3.8%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Industrials

RSPN
92.1%
VIS
90.2%

Technology

RSPN
3.8%
VIS
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPN
2.4%
VIS
1.1%

Utilities

RSPN
1.6%
VIS
3.8%

Financial Services

RSPN
0.1%
VIS
0.2%

Basic Materials

RSPN

-

VIS
0.1%

Communication Services

RSPN

-

VIS
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

RSPN

-

VIS

-

Energy

RSPN

-

VIS
0.2%

Healthcare

RSPN

-

VIS
0.0%

Real Estate

RSPN

-

VIS
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPN vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPN
RSPN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RSPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPN Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPN vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPNVISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.71

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.20

11.22

-5.02

RSPN vs. VIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPN Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the VIS Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPN and VIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPN vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and VIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPNVISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.61%

-63.51%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-12.29%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.89%

-20.80%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-22.96%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

-42.42%

+0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

0.00%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-8.36%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

2.96%

+0.64%

Volatility

RSPN vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) is 5.44%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that RSPN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPNVISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

6.13%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

14.16%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.04%

17.26%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

18.47%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

20.50%

-0.09%

RSPN vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPN vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison

RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than VIS's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF
1.03%0.86%0.98%1.06%1.09%0.70%0.96%1.33%1.49%1.12%1.31%1.51%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.85%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, RSPN and VIS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VIS has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to RSPN (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPN dropped -59.61% vs VIS's -63.51%.

On 10-year performance, RSPN leads with 15.13% vs 14.85% for VIS. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RSPN has been the lower-risk option at 5.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPN has performed better with a 15.13% return vs 14.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPN.

RSPN has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.85% for VIS.

RSPN tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPN and 0.09% for VIS.

VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPN and VIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer