RSPN vs. VIS
RSPN (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - RSPN tracks the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index while VIS tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPN returned 15.13%/yr vs 14.85%/yr for VIS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VIS.
Performance
RSPN vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPN achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 19.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPN having a 15.13% annualized return and VIS not far behind at 14.85%.
RSPN
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 22.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
VIS
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 5.89%
- YTD
- 19.57%
- 6M
- 17.53%
- 1Y
- 33.16%
- 3Y*
- 23.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 14.85%
RSPN vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 11.03% | 13.84% | 17.63% | 22.32% | -8.79% | 26.07% | 18.07% | 33.17% | -13.23% | 23.22% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 19.57% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPN and VIS is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.89 |
The correlation between RSPN and VIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPN vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPN
VIS
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
RSPN
VIS
Technology
RSPN
VIS
Consumer Cyclical
RSPN
VIS
Utilities
RSPN
VIS
Financial Services
RSPN
VIS
Basic Materials
RSPN
-
VIS
Communication Services
RSPN
-
VIS
Consumer Defensive
RSPN
-
VIS
-
Energy
RSPN
-
VIS
Healthcare
RSPN
-
VIS
Real Estate
RSPN
-
VIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPN vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
RSPN
VIS
RSPN vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPN | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 2.71 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 11.22 | -5.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPN vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPN | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.61% | -63.51% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -12.29% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.89% | -20.80% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -22.96% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.02% | -42.42% | +0.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | 0.00% | -1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -8.36% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.96% | +0.64% |
Volatility
RSPN vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) is 5.44%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that RSPN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPN | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 6.13% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 14.16% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 17.26% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 18.47% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 20.50% | -0.09% |
RSPN vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPN vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than VIS's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 1.03% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 1.06% | 1.09% | 0.70% | 0.96% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.51% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.85% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, RSPN and VIS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VIS has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to RSPN (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPN dropped -59.61% vs VIS's -63.51%.
On 10-year performance, RSPN leads with 15.13% vs 14.85% for VIS. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RSPN has been the lower-risk option at 5.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSPN has performed better with a 15.13% return vs 14.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPN.
RSPN has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.85% for VIS.
RSPN tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPN and 0.09% for VIS.
VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPN and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer