RSPN vs. RBLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSPN (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF) and RBLD (First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPN is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while RBLD is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPN returned 14.49%/yr vs 8.19%/yr for RBLD. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSPN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RBLD.

Performance

RSPN vs. RBLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPN achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than RBLD's 16.81% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPN has outperformed RBLD with an annualized return of 14.49%, while RBLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.19% annualized return.

RSPN

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -2.05%
• 6M: 4.96%
• YTD: 11.17%
• 1Y: 16.51%
• 3Y*: 15.49%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: 14.49%
• ALL TIME*: 11.48%

RBLD

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.92%
• 6M: 10.34%
• YTD: 16.81%
• 1Y: 20.06%
• 3Y*: 18.07%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: 8.19%
• ALL TIME*: 8.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RBLD First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF	$127.03K	$1.03M	$779.49K
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF	$7.22M	$5.89M	$7.57M

RSPN vs. RBLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF	11.17%	13.84%	17.63%	22.32%	-8.79%	26.07%	18.07%	33.17%	-13.23%	23.22%
RBLD First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF	16.81%	13.99%	17.94%	19.36%	-9.87%	12.98%	0.51%	12.81%	-21.72%	22.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPN and RBLD is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2008	0.72

The correlation between RSPN and RBLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.88 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPN vs. RBLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPN	RBLD
Industrials	86.7%	42.4%
Technology	7.1%	10.9%
Basic Materials	3.6%	6.1%
Utilities	1.4%	27.9%
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	8.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	4.3%

Return for Risk

RSPN vs. RBLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPN

RSPN Risk / Return Rank: 36
RSPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
RSPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
RSPN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RSPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
RSPN Martin Ratio Rank: 38

RBLD

RBLD Risk / Return Rank: 60
RBLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RBLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
RBLD Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RBLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RBLD Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPN vs. RBLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPN	RBLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.32	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	1.84	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.23	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	2.61	-1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.03	8.60	-4.57

RSPN vs. RBLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPN Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the RBLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPN and RBLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPN vs. RBLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, which is greater than RBLD's maximum drawdown of -50.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and RBLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPN	RBLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.61%	-50.07%	-9.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.36%	-7.19%	-5.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.89%	-19.14%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.88%	-22.54%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.02%	-50.07%	+8.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.50%	-4.12%	+1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.63%	-10.76%	+3.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	2.18%	+1.44%

Volatility

RSPN vs. RBLD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) at 3.65%. This indicates that RSPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPN	RBLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	3.65%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.97%	11.00%	+1.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.33%	14.19%	+2.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.28%	16.78%	+1.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.34%	18.50%	+1.84%

RSPN vs. RBLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RBLD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPN vs. RBLD - Dividend Comparison

RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than RBLD's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RBLD First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF	0.97%	1.19%	1.31%	1.16%	2.10%	1.45%	2.88%	1.84%	1.74%	1.49%	2.01%	1.17%
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF	0.83%	0.86%	0.98%	1.06%	1.09%	0.70%	0.96%	1.33%	1.49%	1.12%	1.31%	1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPN and RBLD in my portfolio?

RSPN and RBLD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPN or RBLD?

RSPN has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to RBLD (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPN dropped -59.61% vs RBLD's -50.07%.

Which ETF is better, RSPN or RBLD?

On 10-year performance, RSPN leads with 14.49% vs 8.19% for RBLD. On fees, RSPN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RBLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPN or RBLD?

Over the 10-year period, RSPN has performed better with a 14.49% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPN or RBLD?

RSPN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPN or RBLD?

RBLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.83% for RSPN.

What is the main difference between RSPN and RBLD?

RSPN is categorized as Industrials Equities, while RBLD is Infrastructure Equities. RSPN tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while RBLD tracks Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPN and 0.65% for RBLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.