RSPN vs. POW
RSPN (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPN is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. RSPN is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RSPN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
RSPN vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPN achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 31.51% return.
RSPN
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 14.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.48%
POW
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -10.55%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.21M | $2.19M | $3.04M | |
| $7.22M | $5.89M | $7.57M |
RSPN vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 11.17% | 0.59% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 31.51% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPN and POW is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPN vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
RSPN
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPN vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPN | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPN vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPN | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.61% | -28.02% | -31.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -22.73% | +20.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -5.52% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPN vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPN | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.33% | 34.38% | -18.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 34.38% | -16.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 34.38% | -14.04% |
RSPN vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPN vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than POW's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.15% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 0.83% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 1.06% | 1.09% | 0.70% | 0.96% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPN and POW have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RSPN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RSPN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
RSPN has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.15% for POW.
RSPN is categorized as Industrials Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPN and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for RSPN and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer