RSPN vs. POW

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

RSPN (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPN is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. RSPN is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

RSPN vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPN achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 44.11% return.

RSPN

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 2.14%
• 6M: 6.64%
• YTD: 12.08%
• 1Y: 16.22%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 12.03%
• 10Y*: 14.46%

POW

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -5.36%
• 6M: 39.04%
• YTD: 44.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPN vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF	12.08%	0.59%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	44.11%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPN and POW is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

RSPN vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPN

RSPN Risk / Return Rank: 32
RSPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
RSPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
RSPN Omega Ratio Rank: 29
RSPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
RSPN Martin Ratio Rank: 35

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPN vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPN	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.24	—	—

Drawdowns

RSPN vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPN	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.61%	-17.41%	-42.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	-15.32%	+13.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-4.25%	-3.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSPN	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.92%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.20%	32.71%	-16.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.28%	32.71%	-14.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.32%	32.71%	-12.39%

RSPN vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPN vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than POW's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.13%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF	0.82%	0.86%	0.98%	1.06%	1.09%	0.70%	0.96%	1.33%	1.49%	1.12%	1.31%	1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPN and POW in my portfolio?

RSPN and POW have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSPN or POW?

On fees, RSPN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPN or POW?

RSPN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPN or POW?

RSPN has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.13% for POW.

What is the main difference between RSPN and POW?

RSPN is categorized as Industrials Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPN and 0.75% for POW.