RSPG vs. PXJ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ).

RSPG and PXJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. PXJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. It was launched on Oct 26, 2005. Both RSPG and PXJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RSPG vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RSPG vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	38.21%	7.01%	6.09%	4.49%	57.97%	57.73%	-32.44%	13.38%	-24.68%	-6.39%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	41.95%	8.74%	0.21%	14.44%	62.25%	11.28%	-44.31%	-0.32%	-39.82%	-23.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPG achieves a 38.21% return, which is significantly lower than PXJ's 41.95% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPG has outperformed PXJ with an annualized return of 11.62%, while PXJ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.61% annualized return.

RSPG

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 10.24%
• YTD: 38.21%
• 6M: 39.08%
• 1Y: 37.07%
• 3Y*: 20.00%
• 5Y*: 24.76%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

PXJ

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: 41.95%
• 6M: 54.34%
• 1Y: 66.96%
• 3Y*: 21.90%
• 5Y*: 21.74%
• 10Y*: -0.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPG vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.

PXJ

Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF

RSPG

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF

Return for Risk

RSPG vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPG

RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 70
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

PXJ

PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 88
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPG vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPG	PXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.94	-0.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.38	-0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.36	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	2.75	-0.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.12	9.91	-4.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPG vs. PXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the PXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPG and PXJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPG	PXJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	1.94	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.62	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	-0.02	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	-0.05	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between RSPG and PXJ is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RSPG vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison

RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than PXJ's 2.27% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	1.89%	2.60%	2.43%	2.84%	3.43%	2.37%	3.15%	2.15%	2.18%	2.55%	1.14%	2.80%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	2.27%	2.91%	3.34%	1.99%	0.65%	2.40%	4.72%	1.87%	0.99%	2.75%	1.18%	2.36%

Drawdowns

RSPG vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, smaller than the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and PXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPG	PXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.98%	-94.82%	+14.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.05%	-24.32%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.44%	-40.03%	+11.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.17%	-87.72%	+14.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	-67.56%	+64.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.63%	-55.58%	+29.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.54%	6.75%	+0.79%

Volatility

RSPG vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) is 5.25%, while Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that RSPG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPG	PXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	8.38%	-3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.93%	19.10%	-4.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.50%	34.71%	-7.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.52%	35.21%	-6.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.57%	39.60%	-6.03%