RSPD vs. TMH
RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - RSPD tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. RSPD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
RSPD vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RSPD
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- -3.92%
- 6M
- -2.73%
- 1Y
- 6.90%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
TMH
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPD vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | -1.44% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -5.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPD and TMH is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPD vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
RSPD
TMH
RSPD vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPD | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.71 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPD | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | -6.75 | +7.08 |
Drawdowns
RSPD vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPD | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.00% | -5.57% | -62.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.70% | -5.57% | -3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.70% | -3.76% | -6.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPD vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPD | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 18.01% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 18.01% | +4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.11% | 18.01% | +5.10% |
RSPD vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPD vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.27% | 1.37% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPD and TMH have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPD.
RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.
RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPD and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for RSPD and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer