RSPC vs. RSP
RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPC returned -0.97%/yr vs 8.63%/yr for RSP. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
RSPC vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -11.21% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 10.72% return.
RSPC
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- -11.21%
- 6M
- -11.40%
- 1Y
- -4.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- -0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
RSP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 18.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
RSPC vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | -11.21% | 18.44% | 17.98% | 17.92% | -29.00% | 14.55% | 22.14% | 21.35% | -11.38% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.72% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -8.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPC and RSP is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSPC and RSP has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RSPC vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPC
RSP
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
RSPC
RSP
Technology
RSPC
RSP
Financial Services
RSPC
RSP
Basic Materials
RSPC
-
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
RSPC
-
RSP
Consumer Defensive
RSPC
-
RSP
Energy
RSPC
-
RSP
Healthcare
RSPC
-
RSP
Industrials
RSPC
-
RSP
Real Estate
RSPC
-
RSP
Utilities
RSPC
-
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPC vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
RSPC
RSP
RSPC vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPC | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.28 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 2.39 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 9.03 | -9.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPC vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPC | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -59.92% | +21.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.05% | -7.85% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | -17.81% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.96% | -21.38% | -16.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.95% | -0.79% | -13.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -6.64% | -6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.92% | 2.08% | +3.84% |
Volatility
RSPC vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 3.59%. This indicates that RSPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPC | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 3.59% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 8.69% | +1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.81% | 11.81% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 16.20% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 18.33% | +2.40% |
RSPC vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPC vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than RSP's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | 1.85% | 1.66% | 1.03% | 0.98% | 1.45% | 1.10% | 1.05% | 0.90% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPC and RSP have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPC has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to RSP (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPC dropped -38.03% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 5-year performance, RSP leads with 8.63% vs -0.97% for RSPC. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RSP has performed better with a 8.63% return vs -0.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPC.
RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.52% for RSP.
RSPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.20% for RSP.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPC and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer