RSPC vs. IXP
RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and IXP (iShares Global Comm Services ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while IXP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPC returned -0.13%/yr vs 7.85%/yr for IXP. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IXP.
Performance
RSPC vs. IXP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -8.48% return, which is significantly lower than IXP's -2.34% return.
RSPC
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- -8.48%
- 1Y
- -1.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- —
IXP
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -2.34%
- 1Y
- 10.44%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
RSPC vs. IXP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | -8.48% | 18.44% | 17.98% | 17.92% | -29.00% | 14.55% | 22.14% | 21.35% | -11.38% |
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | -2.34% | 29.27% | 31.33% | 38.80% | -33.40% | 12.77% | 22.16% | 25.23% | -3.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPC and IXP is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between RSPC and IXP shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSPC vs. IXP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPC
IXP
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
RSPC
IXP
Technology
RSPC
IXP
Financial Services
RSPC
IXP
-
Basic Materials
RSPC
-
IXP
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPC
-
IXP
Consumer Defensive
RSPC
-
IXP
-
Energy
RSPC
-
IXP
-
Healthcare
RSPC
-
IXP
-
Industrials
RSPC
-
IXP
-
Real Estate
RSPC
-
IXP
Utilities
RSPC
-
IXP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPC vs. IXP — Risk / Return Rank
RSPC
IXP
RSPC vs. IXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPC | IXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.13 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 0.85 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 2.45 | -2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPC vs. IXP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, smaller than the maximum IXP drawdown of -50.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and IXP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPC | IXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -50.11% | +12.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.71% | -12.26% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.71% | -17.54% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.73% | -44.30% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.30% | -6.42% | -4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -11.90% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 4.27% | +2.23% |
Volatility
RSPC vs. IXP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) is 4.93%, while iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that RSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPC | IXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 5.34% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.28% | 11.58% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.00% | 15.12% | -1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 19.11% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 18.50% | +2.21% |
RSPC vs. IXP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IXP's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPC vs. IXP - Dividend Comparison
RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than IXP's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | 3.34% | 2.98% | 1.35% | 1.24% | 0.62% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.18% | 4.32% | 3.41% | 4.02% | 3.89% |
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | 1.79% | 1.66% | 1.03% | 0.98% | 1.45% | 1.10% | 1.05% | 0.90% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPC and IXP have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXP has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to RSPC (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPC dropped -38.03% vs IXP's -50.11%.
On 5-year performance, IXP leads with 7.85% vs -0.13% for RSPC. On fees, RSPC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPC has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IXP has performed better with a 7.85% return vs -0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IXP.
IXP has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 1.79% for RSPC.
RSPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while IXP is Large Cap Growth Equities. RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while IXP tracks S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.43% for IXP.
IXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPC and IXP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer