RSP vs. SPHQ
RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from Invesco - RSP tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index while SPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSP returned 11.86%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for SPHQ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
RSP vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 15.48% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 11.86%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 15.48%
- 6M
- 16.06%
- 1Y
- 23.22%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
RSP vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 15.48% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and SPHQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2005 | 0.87 |
The correlation between RSP and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSP vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSP
SPHQ
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
RSP
SPHQ
Financial Services
RSP
SPHQ
Industrials
RSP
SPHQ
Healthcare
RSP
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
RSP
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
RSP
SPHQ
Utilities
RSP
SPHQ
Real Estate
RSP
SPHQ
-
Energy
RSP
SPHQ
Basic Materials
RSP
SPHQ
Communication Services
RSP
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSP vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
RSP
SPHQ
RSP vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSP | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 1.85 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 2.69 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.62 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 11.17 | -1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSP | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.85 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.89 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.84 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.53 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
RSP vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSP | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -57.83% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -8.90% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -16.57% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -25.04% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -31.60% | -7.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | 0.00% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -10.70% | +4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 2.08% | -0.02% |
Volatility
RSP vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 2.56%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSP | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 3.49% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.29% | 10.18% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 12.62% | -1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 16.45% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 17.86% | +0.49% |
RSP vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RSP vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.04% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSP and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.01% vs 11.86% for RSP. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.
RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSP and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer