RSP vs. QQQM
RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSP returned 8.33%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
RSP vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
RSP vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.97% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and QQQM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.69 |
The correlation between RSP and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSP vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSP
QQQM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
RSP
QQQM
Financial Services
RSP
QQQM
Industrials
RSP
QQQM
Healthcare
RSP
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
RSP
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
RSP
QQQM
Utilities
RSP
QQQM
Real Estate
RSP
QQQM
Energy
RSP
QQQM
Basic Materials
RSP
QQQM
Communication Services
RSP
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSP vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
RSP
QQQM
RSP vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSP | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 2.65 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 3.46 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.45 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 3.53 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 13.52 | -4.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSP | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.65 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.82 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.85 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
RSP vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSP | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -35.04% | -24.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -11.96% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -22.70% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -35.04% | +13.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.20% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -8.25% | +1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 3.11% | -1.05% |
Volatility
RSP vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 2.56%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSP | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 4.48% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.29% | 12.05% | -3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 15.91% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 22.24% | -6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 22.12% | -3.77% |
RSP vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RSP vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSP and QQQM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 8.33% for RSP. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSP and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer