PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSP vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSP vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.


RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%

QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSP vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.97%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RSP and QQQM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.69

The correlation between RSP and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSP vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSP
QQQM

Technology

19.6%
53.8%

Financial Services

14.5%
0.2%

Industrials

14.1%
2.8%

Healthcare

11.0%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
7.7%

Utilities

6.1%
1.4%

Real Estate

6.0%
0.1%

Energy

4.5%
0.6%

Basic Materials

4.1%
1.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
15.8%

Technology

RSP
19.6%
QQQM
53.8%

Financial Services

RSP
14.5%
QQQM
0.2%

Industrials

RSP
14.1%
QQQM
2.8%

Healthcare

RSP
11.0%
QQQM
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RSP
9.9%
QQQM
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

RSP
6.5%
QQQM
7.7%

Utilities

RSP
6.1%
QQQM
1.4%

Real Estate

RSP
6.0%
QQQM
0.1%

Energy

RSP
4.5%
QQQM
0.6%

Basic Materials

RSP
4.1%
QQQM
1.1%

Communication Services

RSP
3.7%
QQQM
15.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSP vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSP vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

2.65

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

3.46

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.53

-1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.48

13.52

-4.04

RSP vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSP and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.65

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.82

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.85

-0.28

Drawdowns

RSP vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.92%

-35.04%

-24.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-11.96%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-22.70%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-35.04%

+13.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.20%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-8.25%

+1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

3.11%

-1.05%

Volatility

RSP vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 2.56%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

4.48%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

12.05%

-3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

15.91%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

22.24%

-6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

22.12%

-3.77%

RSP vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RSP vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSP and QQQM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 8.33% for RSP. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.15% for QQQM.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSP and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer