RSI vs. FTI
RSI (Rush Street Interactive, Inc.) and FTI (TechnipFMC plc) are both stocks. RSI operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while FTI operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 5 years, RSI returned 22.26%/yr vs 58.89%/yr for FTI. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RSI vs. FTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSI achieves a 38.50% return, which is significantly lower than FTI's 61.05% return.
RSI
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -13.92%
- 6M
- 52.29%
- YTD
- 38.50%
- 1Y
- 33.48%
- 3Y*
- 91.20%
- 5Y*
- 22.26%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.83%
FTI
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 28.80%
- YTD
- 61.05%
- 1Y
- 97.83%
- 3Y*
- 59.85%
- 5Y*
- 58.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $254.67M | $262.31M | $331.74M | |
| $95.94M | $82.72M | $81.03M |
RSI vs. FTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc. | 38.50% | 41.62% | 205.57% | 25.07% | -78.24% | -23.79% | 125.05% |
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 61.05% | 54.90% | 44.78% | 66.07% | 105.91% | -15.36% | 13.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSI and FTI is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2020 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
RSI:
$6.66B
FTI:
$28.57B
RSI:
$0.64
FTI:
$2.86
RSI:
42.26
FTI:
25.03
RSI:
0.08
FTI:
0.03
RSI:
2.07
FTI:
2.83
RSI:
16.16
FTI:
8.91
RSI:
$1.37B
FTI:
$10.40B
RSI:
$478.00M
FTI:
$3.10B
RSI:
$213.86M
FTI:
$1.86B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSI vs. FTI — Risk / Return Rank
RSI
FTI
RSI vs. FTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSI | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.48 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 5.98 | -4.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 17.23 | -14.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSI vs. FTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSI drawdown since its inception was -88.92%, roughly equal to the maximum FTI drawdown of -91.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSI and FTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSI | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.92% | -91.74% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.47% | -16.44% | -13.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.04% | -28.94% | -13.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.88% | -36.71% | -50.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -85.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.05% | -6.86% | -15.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.27% | -33.78% | -15.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.08% | 5.74% | +7.34% |
Volatility
RSI vs. FTI - Volatility Comparison
Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) has a higher volatility of 18.30% compared to TechnipFMC plc (FTI) at 10.26%. This indicates that RSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSI | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.30% | 10.26% | +8.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.18% | 23.71% | +12.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.99% | 31.03% | +23.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.21% | 41.90% | +20.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.54% | 47.67% | +12.87% |
Dividends
RSI vs. FTI - Dividend Comparison
RSI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 0.28% | 0.45% | 0.69% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.38% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 0.42% |
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RSI vs. FTI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Street Interactive, Inc. and TechnipFMC plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RSI vs. FTI - Profitability Comparison
RSI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 139.66M and revenue of 393.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.
FTI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.40B and revenue of 2.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.
RSI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported an operating income of 46.23M and revenue of 393.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.
FTI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 484.70M and revenue of 2.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.
RSI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a net income of 46.44M and revenue of 393.78M, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.
FTI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 362.70M and revenue of 2.76B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSI and FTI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSI has higher volatility (18.30%) compared to FTI (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSI dropped -88.92% vs FTI's -91.74%.
FTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSI and FTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer