RSFYX vs. BGT
RSFYX (Victory Floating Rate Fund) and BGT (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 10 years, RSFYX returned 4.57%/yr vs 6.51%/yr for BGT. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RSFYX charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for BGT.
Performance
RSFYX vs. BGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSFYX achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than BGT's 3.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RSFYX has underperformed BGT with an annualized return of 4.57%, while BGT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.51% annualized return.
RSFYX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 5.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- 4.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.52%
BGT
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- -3.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.59M | $1.30M | $1.18M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RSFYX vs. BGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSFYX Victory Floating Rate Fund | 2.96% | 7.09% | 8.64% | 7.48% | -6.82% | 4.12% | 4.96% | 9.68% | 0.69% | 4.00% |
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 3.20% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 25.89% | -0.81% | 18.97% | -11.95% | 3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSFYX and BGT is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSFYX vs. BGT — Risk / Return Rank
RSFYX
BGT
RSFYX vs. BGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSFYX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 0.96 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.46 | -0.25 | +4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.61 | -0.52 | +15.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSFYX vs. BGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSFYX drawdown since its inception was -21.42%, smaller than the maximum BGT drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSFYX and BGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSFYX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.42% | -58.06% | +36.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.23% | -11.06% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.76% | -15.91% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.82% | -23.19% | +14.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.42% | -41.90% | +20.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -3.09% | +2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -8.10% | +6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 5.41% | -4.99% |
Volatility
RSFYX vs. BGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) is 0.52%, while BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that RSFYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSFYX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 3.08% | -2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.16% | 7.43% | -4.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.97% | 9.95% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 13.60% | -10.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 15.35% | -11.14% |
RSFYX vs. BGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSFYX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BGT's 1.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSFYX vs. BGT - Dividend Comparison
RSFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, less than BGT's 13.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.33% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
RSFYX Victory Floating Rate Fund | 6.58% | 9.39% | 9.01% | 8.22% | 6.22% | 4.16% | 5.47% | 6.07% | 5.93% | 5.07% | 4.99% | 5.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSFYX and BGT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGT has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to RSFYX (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSFYX dropped -21.42% vs BGT's -58.06%.
RSFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSFYX and BGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer