PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSFYX vs. DDFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSFYX vs. DDFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) and Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSFYX achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than DDFLX's 1.89% return. Over the past 10 years, RSFYX has underperformed DDFLX with an annualized return of 4.85%, while DDFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.41% annualized return.


RSFYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
3.35%
6M
4.14%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
4.06%
10Y*
4.85%

DDFLX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.59%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
5.79%
10Y*
5.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSFYX vs. DDFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSFYX
Victory Floating Rate Fund
3.35%7.09%8.64%7.48%-6.82%4.12%4.96%9.68%0.69%4.00%
DDFLX
Delaware Floating Rate Fund
1.89%6.01%8.92%10.75%-0.62%5.46%3.17%10.69%1.26%4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RSFYX and DDFLX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2010

0.48

The correlation between RSFYX and DDFLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSFYX vs. DDFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSFYX
RSFYX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RSFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
RSFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DDFLX
DDFLX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DDFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DDFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSFYX vs. DDFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) and Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSFYXDDFLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.08

2.77

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.26

6.81

-1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

2.22

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.57

6.18

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.75

22.77

-1.02

RSFYX vs. DDFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSFYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the DDFLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSFYX and DDFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSFYXDDFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.77

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

2.16

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

1.55

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

1.37

-0.11

Drawdowns

RSFYX vs. DDFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSFYX drawdown since its inception was -21.42%, which is greater than DDFLX's maximum drawdown of -18.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSFYX and DDFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSFYXDDFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.42%

-18.09%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.39%

-1.11%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.76%

-2.05%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.82%

-5.18%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.42%

-18.09%

-3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.34%

-0.67%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.30%

+0.12%

Volatility

RSFYX vs. DDFLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) is 0.52%, while Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX) has a volatility of 0.61%. This indicates that RSFYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSFYXDDFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

0.61%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.28%

1.69%

+1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01%

2.26%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.59%

2.70%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.23%

3.50%

+0.73%

RSFYX vs. DDFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSFYX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DDFLX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSFYX vs. DDFLX - Dividend Comparison

RSFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than DDFLX's 6.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDFLX
Delaware Floating Rate Fund
6.79%7.21%8.62%7.17%5.04%3.96%4.89%6.54%5.73%4.33%2.09%2.34%
RSFYX
Victory Floating Rate Fund
7.74%9.39%9.01%8.22%6.22%4.16%5.47%6.07%5.93%5.07%4.99%5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSFYX and DDFLX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDFLX has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to RSFYX (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSFYX dropped -21.42% vs DDFLX's -18.09%.

DDFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSFYX and DDFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer