PortfoliosLab logo
RSFYX vs. CLOZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RSFYX and CLOZ is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RSFYX vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RSFYX:

2.06

CLOZ:

1.81

Sortino Ratio

RSFYX:

3.30

CLOZ:

2.41

Omega Ratio

RSFYX:

1.64

CLOZ:

1.65

Calmar Ratio

RSFYX:

2.67

CLOZ:

1.65

Martin Ratio

RSFYX:

11.64

CLOZ:

7.79

Ulcer Index

RSFYX:

0.63%

CLOZ:

1.13%

Daily Std Dev

RSFYX:

3.74%

CLOZ:

4.86%

Max Drawdown

RSFYX:

-21.41%

CLOZ:

-5.33%

Current Drawdown

RSFYX:

-0.40%

CLOZ:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSFYX achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 2.45% return.


RSFYX

YTD

1.39%

1M

1.12%

6M

2.72%

1Y

7.63%

3Y*

6.02%

5Y*

5.74%

10Y*

4.11%

CLOZ

YTD

2.45%

1M

2.64%

6M

3.38%

1Y

8.73%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Victory Floating Rate Fund

Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF

RSFYX vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSFYX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSFYX vs. CLOZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSFYX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSFYX is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSFYX is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSFYX is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSFYX is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSFYX is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSFYX is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLOZ is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RSFYX vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RSFYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSFYX and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RSFYX vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

RSFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, more than CLOZ's 8.50% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RSFYX
Victory Floating Rate Fund
9.79%9.15%9.95%6.27%4.18%5.47%6.07%5.91%5.10%4.99%5.34%4.49%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
8.50%9.09%8.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RSFYX vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSFYX drawdown since its inception was -21.41%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSFYX and CLOZ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RSFYX vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) is 1.11%, while Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) has a volatility of 1.51%. This indicates that RSFYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...