RRX vs. CRS
RRX (Regal Rexnord Corporation) and CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — RRX in Specialty Industrial Machinery, CRS in Metal Fabrication. Over the past 10 years, RRX returned 15.16%/yr vs 32.06%/yr for CRS. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RRX vs. CRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RRX achieves a 46.78% return, which is significantly lower than CRS's 65.23% return. Over the past 10 years, RRX has underperformed CRS with an annualized return of 15.16%, while CRS has yielded a comparatively higher 32.06% annualized return.
RRX
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- 6M
- 27.53%
- YTD
- 46.78%
- 1Y
- 38.73%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.78%
CRS
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -12.99%
- 6M
- 63.58%
- YTD
- 65.23%
- 1Y
- 102.13%
- 3Y*
- 106.41%
- 5Y*
- 70.73%
- 10Y*
- 32.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $455.19M | $399.26M | $397.99M | |
| $197.88M | $208.15M | $234.56M |
RRX vs. CRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RRX Regal Rexnord Corporation | 46.78% | -8.61% | 5.74% | 24.56% | -28.75% | 46.56% | 45.52% | 24.03% | -7.20% | 12.08% |
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 65.23% | 86.23% | 141.72% | 94.48% | 29.50% | 2.66% | -39.44% | 42.12% | -29.16% | 43.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between RRX and CRS is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.38 |
The correlation between RRX and CRS shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RRX:
$13.66B
CRS:
$25.82B
RRX:
$4.30
CRS:
$10.53
RRX:
47.74
CRS:
49.34
RRX:
4.96
CRS:
0.04
RRX:
2.28
CRS:
8.37
RRX:
2.01
CRS:
11.71
RRX:
$6.00B
CRS:
$3.12B
RRX:
$2.25B
CRS:
$955.40M
RRX:
$1.19B
CRS:
$797.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RRX vs. CRS — Risk / Return Rank
RRX
CRS
RRX vs. CRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RRX | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.37 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 5.87 | -4.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | 20.89 | -16.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RRX vs. CRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RRX drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, smaller than the maximum CRS drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRX and CRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RRX | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.65% | -84.68% | +31.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.72% | -18.66% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.11% | -28.74% | -19.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.11% | -41.86% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.11% | -74.70% | +26.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.84% | -16.08% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.56% | -27.16% | +10.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.05% | 5.23% | +3.82% |
Volatility
RRX vs. CRS - Volatility Comparison
Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) have volatilities of 14.87% and 14.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RRX | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.87% | 14.21% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.49% | 33.58% | +6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.76% | 50.12% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.89% | 46.58% | -5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.84% | 48.87% | -12.03% |
Dividends
RRX vs. CRS - Dividend Comparison
RRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than CRS's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 1.13% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 1.99% | 2.38% |
RRX Regal Rexnord Corporation | 0.68% | 1.00% | 0.90% | 0.95% | 1.15% | 4.87% | 0.98% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.33% | 1.37% | 1.56% |
Financials
RRX vs. CRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regal Rexnord Corporation and Carpenter Technology Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RRX vs. CRS - Profitability Comparison
RRX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Regal Rexnord Corporation reported a gross profit of 549.90M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.2%.
CRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 268.90M and revenue of 851.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.6%.
RRX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Regal Rexnord Corporation reported an operating income of 152.70M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.
CRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 206.90M and revenue of 851.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.
RRX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Regal Rexnord Corporation reported a net income of 64.30M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
CRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 162.40M and revenue of 851.00M, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RRX and CRS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RRX has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to CRS (14.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRX dropped -53.65% vs CRS's -84.68%.
CRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RRX and CRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer