PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRX vs. MP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RRX vs. MP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRX achieves a 52.79% return, which is significantly higher than MP's 35.69% return.


RRX

1D
5.88%
1M
0.45%
YTD
52.79%
6M
49.91%
1Y
63.89%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*
16.00%

MP

1D
-5.11%
1M
3.55%
YTD
35.69%
6M
16.76%
1Y
211.59%
3Y*
45.90%
5Y*
16.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRX vs. MP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RRX
Regal Rexnord Corporation
52.79%-8.61%5.74%24.56%-28.75%46.56%49.95%
MP
MP Materials Corp.
35.69%223.85%-21.41%-18.25%-46.54%41.19%221.70%

Correlation

The correlation between RRX and MP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020

0.34

The correlation between RRX and MP shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

RRX:

$4.30

MP:

-$0.53

PS Ratio

RRX:

2.38

MP:

30.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

RRX:

$6.00B

MP:

$305.30M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RRX:

$2.25B

MP:

$25.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

RRX:

$1.19B

MP:

$1.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRX vs. MP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRX
RRX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MP
MP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MP Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRX vs. MP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RRXMPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

2.27

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

3.17

-1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.96

-1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.54

6.77

-0.22

RRX vs. MP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the MP Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRX and MP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RRXMPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.27

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.24

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.53

-0.12

Drawdowns

RRX vs. MP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRX drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, smaller than the maximum MP drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRX and MP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRXMPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.65%

-81.99%

+28.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.72%

-53.79%

+32.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.11%

-59.47%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.11%

-81.99%

+33.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.52%

-30.51%

+22.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.59%

-42.63%

+26.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.45%

31.40%

-21.95%

Volatility

RRX vs. MP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) is 18.40%, while MP Materials Corp. (MP) has a volatility of 21.38%. This indicates that RRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRXMPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.40%

21.38%

-2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.09%

50.40%

-13.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.18%

93.94%

-47.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.12%

69.57%

-29.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.41%

72.60%

-36.19%

Dividends

RRX vs. MP - Dividend Comparison

RRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while MP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MP
MP Materials Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RRX
Regal Rexnord Corporation
0.65%1.00%0.90%0.95%1.15%4.87%0.98%1.38%1.57%1.33%1.37%1.56%

Financials

RRX vs. MP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regal Rexnord Corporation and MP Materials Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.48B
90.65M
(RRX) Total Revenue
(MP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RRX vs. MP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regal Rexnord Corporation and MP Materials Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
37.2%
0
Portfolio components
RRX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regal Rexnord Corporation reported a gross profit of 549.90M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.2%.

MP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RRX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regal Rexnord Corporation reported an operating income of 152.70M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.

MP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

RRX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regal Rexnord Corporation reported a net income of 64.30M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.

MP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a net income of -7.97M and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RRX and MP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MP has higher volatility (21.38%) compared to RRX (18.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRX dropped -53.65% vs MP's -81.99%.

MP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRX and MP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer