RRX vs. MP
RRX (Regal Rexnord Corporation) and MP (MP Materials Corp.) are both stocks. RRX operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while MP operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, RRX returned 10.88%/yr vs 16.72%/yr for MP. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RRX vs. MP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RRX achieves a 52.79% return, which is significantly higher than MP's 35.69% return.
RRX
- 1D
- 5.88%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 52.79%
- 6M
- 49.91%
- 1Y
- 63.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.88%
- 10Y*
- 16.00%
MP
- 1D
- -5.11%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 35.69%
- 6M
- 16.76%
- 1Y
- 211.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.90%
- 5Y*
- 16.72%
- 10Y*
- —
RRX vs. MP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RRX Regal Rexnord Corporation | 52.79% | -8.61% | 5.74% | 24.56% | -28.75% | 46.56% | 49.95% |
MP MP Materials Corp. | 35.69% | 223.85% | -21.41% | -18.25% | -46.54% | 41.19% | 221.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between RRX and MP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020 | 0.34 |
The correlation between RRX and MP shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RRX:
$4.30
MP:
-$0.53
RRX:
2.38
MP:
30.21
RRX:
$6.00B
MP:
$305.30M
RRX:
$2.25B
MP:
$25.30M
RRX:
$1.19B
MP:
$1.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RRX vs. MP — Risk / Return Rank
RRX
MP
RRX vs. MP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RRX | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 2.27 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 3.17 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.96 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 6.77 | -0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RRX | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.27 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.24 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.53 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
RRX vs. MP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RRX drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, smaller than the maximum MP drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRX and MP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RRX | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.65% | -81.99% | +28.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.72% | -53.79% | +32.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.11% | -59.47% | +11.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.11% | -81.99% | +33.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.52% | -30.51% | +22.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.59% | -42.63% | +26.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.45% | 31.40% | -21.95% |
Volatility
RRX vs. MP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) is 18.40%, while MP Materials Corp. (MP) has a volatility of 21.38%. This indicates that RRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RRX | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.40% | 21.38% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.09% | 50.40% | -13.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.18% | 93.94% | -47.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.12% | 69.57% | -29.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 72.60% | -36.19% |
Dividends
RRX vs. MP - Dividend Comparison
RRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while MP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MP MP Materials Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RRX Regal Rexnord Corporation | 0.65% | 1.00% | 0.90% | 0.95% | 1.15% | 4.87% | 0.98% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.33% | 1.37% | 1.56% |
Financials
RRX vs. MP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regal Rexnord Corporation and MP Materials Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RRX vs. MP - Profitability Comparison
RRX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regal Rexnord Corporation reported a gross profit of 549.90M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.2%.
MP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RRX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regal Rexnord Corporation reported an operating income of 152.70M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.
MP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
RRX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regal Rexnord Corporation reported a net income of 64.30M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
MP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a net income of -7.97M and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RRX and MP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MP has higher volatility (21.38%) compared to RRX (18.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRX dropped -53.65% vs MP's -81.99%.
MP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RRX and MP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer