RRX vs. TKR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RRX (Regal Rexnord Corporation) and TKR (The Timken Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — RRX in Specialty Industrial Machinery, TKR in Tools & Accessories. Over the past 10 years, RRX returned 16.07%/yr vs 16.99%/yr for TKR. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RRX vs. TKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) and The Timken Company (TKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRX achieves a 53.72% return, which is significantly lower than TKR's 57.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RRX has underperformed TKR with an annualized return of 16.07%, while TKR has yielded a comparatively higher 16.99% annualized return.

RRX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 53.72%
• 6M: 56.70%
• 1Y: 59.72%
• 3Y*: 16.52%
• 5Y*: 10.83%
• 10Y*: 16.07%

TKR

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 23.45%
• YTD: 57.70%
• 6M: 60.78%
• 1Y: 89.69%
• 3Y*: 21.01%
• 5Y*: 10.06%
• 10Y*: 16.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRX vs. TKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RRX Regal Rexnord Corporation	53.72%	-8.61%	5.74%	24.56%	-28.75%	46.56%	45.52%	24.03%	-7.20%	12.08%
TKR The Timken Company	57.70%	20.02%	-9.48%	15.36%	3.91%	-9.03%	40.35%	54.69%	-22.18%	26.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RRX and TKR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1985	0.43

Over the past year, RRX and TKR have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap RRX : $14.38B TKR : $9.25B
EPS RRX : $4.30 TKR : $4.50
PE Ratio RRX : 50.04 TKR : 29.27
PS Ratio RRX : 2.39 TKR : 1.98
PB Ratio RRX : 2.11 TKR : 2.89
Total Revenue (TTM) RRX : $6.00B TKR : $4.67B
Gross Profit (TTM) RRX : $2.25B TKR : $954.60M
EBITDA (TTM) RRX : $1.19B TKR : $705.00M

Return for Risk

RRX vs. TKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRX

RRX Risk / Return Rank: 76
RRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
RRX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
RRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RRX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

TKR

TKR Risk / Return Rank: 93
TKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
TKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
TKR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
TKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
TKR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRX vs. TKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) and The Timken Company (TKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RRX	TKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	2.75	-1.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	3.68	-1.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.44	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	6.73	-3.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.33	17.97	-11.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RRX vs. TKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the TKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRX and TKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RRX	TKR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	2.75	-1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.31	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.48	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.26	+0.15

Drawdowns

RRX vs. TKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRX drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, smaller than the maximum TKR drawdown of -72.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRX and TKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RRX	TKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.65%	-72.45%	+18.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.72%	-13.40%	-8.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.11%	-37.61%	-10.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.11%	-40.62%	-7.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.11%	-58.26%	+10.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.96%	-0.06%	-6.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.59%	-22.02%	+5.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.46%	5.01%	+4.45%

Volatility

RRX vs. TKR - Volatility Comparison

Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) has a higher volatility of 18.41% compared to The Timken Company (TKR) at 14.28%. This indicates that RRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RRX	TKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.41%	14.28%	+4.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.08%	24.91%	+12.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.15%	32.86%	+13.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.12%	32.81%	+7.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.40%	35.77%	+0.63%

Dividends

RRX vs. TKR - Dividend Comparison

RRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than TKR's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RRX Regal Rexnord Corporation	0.65%	1.00%	0.90%	0.95%	1.15%	4.87%	0.98%	1.38%	1.57%	1.33%	1.37%	1.56%
TKR The Timken Company	1.07%	1.65%	1.89%	1.62%	1.74%	1.72%	1.46%	1.99%	2.97%	2.18%	2.62%	3.60%

Financials

RRX vs. TKR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regal Rexnord Corporation and The Timken Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RRX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regal Rexnord Corporation reported a gross profit of 549.90M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.2%.

TKR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Timken Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RRX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regal Rexnord Corporation reported an operating income of 152.70M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.

TKR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Timken Company reported an operating income of 168.60M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

RRX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regal Rexnord Corporation reported a net income of 64.30M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.

TKR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Timken Company reported a net income of 105.90M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RRX and TKR in my portfolio?

RRX and TKR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RRX or TKR?

RRX has higher volatility (18.41%) compared to TKR (14.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRX dropped -53.65% vs TKR's -72.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.