RRPAX vs. LIFIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RRPAX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund) and LIFIX (Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, RRPAX returned 2.85%/yr vs 3.98%/yr for LIFIX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RRPAX charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for LIFIX.

Performance

RRPAX vs. LIFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRPAX achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly higher than LIFIX's 0.91% return. Over the past 10 years, RRPAX has underperformed LIFIX with an annualized return of 2.85%, while LIFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.98% annualized return.

RRPAX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 3.36%
• 3Y*: 4.70%
• 5Y*: 2.80%
• 10Y*: 2.85%

LIFIX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: 5.07%
• 5Y*: 3.09%
• 10Y*: 3.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRPAX vs. LIFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RRPAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund	1.11%	6.53%	4.54%	3.49%	-4.06%	5.41%	5.64%	5.01%	0.31%	0.73%
LIFIX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund	0.91%	7.16%	4.81%	3.87%	-5.34%	10.43%	6.05%	5.17%	-1.06%	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RRPAX and LIFIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011	0.48

Over the past year, RRPAX and LIFIX have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

RRPAX vs. LIFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRPAX

RRPAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
RRPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RRPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RRPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
RRPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
RRPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

LIFIX

LIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
LIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
LIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
LIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
LIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
LIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRPAX vs. LIFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RRPAX	LIFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.75	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	3.03	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.38	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.68	3.28	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.75	13.18	+0.57

RRPAX vs. LIFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the LIFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRPAX and LIFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RRPAX vs. LIFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRPAX drawdown since its inception was -16.15%, smaller than the maximum LIFIX drawdown of -18.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRPAX and LIFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RRPAX	LIFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.15%	-18.02%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.95%	-1.27%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.89%	-2.11%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.48%	-8.49%	+2.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-6.48%	-18.02%	+11.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	-1.18%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.94%	-3.22%	+0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.25%	0.32%	-0.07%

Volatility

RRPAX vs. LIFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) is 0.81%, while Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that RRPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RRPAX	LIFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.81%	0.95%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.45%	1.78%	-0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91%	2.39%	-0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.24%	3.99%	-0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.70%	4.53%	-1.83%

RRPAX vs. LIFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRPAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than LIFIX's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

RRPAX vs. LIFIX - Dividend Comparison

RRPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than LIFIX's 4.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIFIX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund	4.97%	4.94%	4.17%	3.88%	2.77%	2.55%	3.77%	4.15%	4.18%	3.96%	4.43%	4.42%
RRPAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund	3.96%	4.64%	3.57%	2.43%	7.18%	5.33%	1.38%	2.14%	2.35%	1.89%	1.23%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RRPAX and LIFIX in my portfolio?

RRPAX and LIFIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RRPAX or LIFIX?

LIFIX has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to RRPAX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRPAX dropped -16.15% vs LIFIX's -18.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RRPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.