PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIFIX vs. LAVLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIFIX vs. LAVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) and Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIFIX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than LAVLX's 12.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LIFIX has underperformed LAVLX with an annualized return of 3.97%, while LAVLX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.85% annualized return.


LIFIX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.56%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
3.97%

LAVLX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.85%
YTD
12.53%
6M
11.11%
1Y
25.36%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
8.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIFIX vs. LAVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIFIX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund
1.17%7.16%4.81%3.87%-5.34%10.43%6.05%5.17%-1.06%1.46%
LAVLX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund
12.53%7.28%14.96%15.50%-11.02%28.79%2.73%22.92%-14.55%7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between LIFIX and LAVLX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011

0.31

The correlation between LIFIX and LAVLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIFIX vs. LAVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIFIX
LIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
LIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
LIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

LAVLX
LAVLX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LAVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
LAVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIFIX vs. LAVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) and Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIFIXLAVLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.36

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

3.31

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

12.16

+2.86

LIFIX vs. LAVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the LAVLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIFIX and LAVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIFIX vs. LAVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIFIX drawdown since its inception was -18.02%, smaller than the maximum LAVLX drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFIX and LAVLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIFIXLAVLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.02%

-60.58%

+42.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.27%

-7.72%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.11%

-20.91%

+18.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.49%

-21.76%

+13.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.02%

-42.16%

+24.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.58%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-8.11%

+4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

2.09%

-1.78%

Volatility

LIFIX vs. LAVLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) is 0.92%, while Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that LIFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIFIXLAVLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

4.46%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.76%

9.43%

-7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

12.66%

-10.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.00%

17.31%

-13.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.53%

19.58%

-15.05%

LIFIX vs. LAVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIFIX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than LAVLX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIFIX vs. LAVLX - Dividend Comparison

LIFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than LAVLX's 6.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAVLX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund
6.26%7.04%9.70%1.23%8.40%8.51%1.19%3.19%6.55%2.67%0.60%0.79%
LIFIX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund
4.96%4.94%4.17%3.88%2.77%2.55%3.77%4.15%4.18%3.96%4.43%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIFIX and LAVLX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAVLX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to LIFIX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIFIX dropped -18.02% vs LAVLX's -60.58%.

LAVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIFIX and LAVLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer