LIFIX vs. BIIPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LIFIX (Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund) and BIIPX (iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, LIFIX returned 3.32%/yr vs 2.76%/yr for BIIPX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LIFIX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for BIIPX.

Performance

LIFIX vs. BIIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) and iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund (BIIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIFIX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than BIIPX's 0.82% return.

LIFIX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 1.56%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: 5.10%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: 3.97%

BIIPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 3.39%
• 3Y*: 4.68%
• 5Y*: 2.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIFIX vs. BIIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LIFIX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund	1.17%	7.16%	4.81%	3.87%	-5.34%	10.43%	6.05%	5.17%	-1.06%	1.46%
BIIPX iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund	0.82%	6.05%	4.75%	3.25%	-4.12%	5.19%	4.89%	4.83%	0.58%	0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between LIFIX and BIIPX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.60

The correlation between LIFIX and BIIPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LIFIX vs. BIIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIFIX

LIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 74
LIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
LIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
LIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
LIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

BIIPX

BIIPX Risk / Return Rank: 55
BIIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
BIIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BIIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BIIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BIIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIFIX vs. BIIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) and iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund (BIIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIFIX	BIIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.56	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	2.86	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.38	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	2.96	+0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.02	11.68	+3.35

LIFIX vs. BIIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the BIIPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIFIX and BIIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LIFIX vs. BIIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIFIX drawdown since its inception was -18.02%, which is greater than BIIPX's maximum drawdown of -6.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFIX and BIIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIFIX	BIIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.02%	-6.46%	-11.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.27%	-1.22%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.11%	-1.22%	-0.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.49%	-6.46%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-1.13%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.22%	-1.08%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	0.31%	0.00%

Volatility

LIFIX vs. BIIPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) is 0.92%, while iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund (BIIPX) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that LIFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIFIX	BIIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	1.30%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.76%	1.75%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37%	2.32%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.00%	3.11%	+0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.53%	2.64%	+1.89%

LIFIX vs. BIIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIFIX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than BIIPX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIFIX vs. BIIPX - Dividend Comparison

LIFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than BIIPX's 4.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIIPX iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund	4.64%	4.64%	4.30%	2.65%	4.56%	4.39%	1.58%	2.27%	2.74%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%
LIFIX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund	4.96%	4.94%	4.17%	3.88%	2.77%	2.55%	3.77%	4.15%	4.18%	3.96%	4.43%	4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIFIX and BIIPX in my portfolio?

LIFIX and BIIPX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIFIX or BIIPX?

BIIPX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to LIFIX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIFIX dropped -18.02% vs BIIPX's -6.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.